SANJAY K.AGRAWAL
P. N. Upadhyay – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.
1. Excellent question that emanates for consideration is nature of Rule making function exercised by the Registrar under Section 55(1) of the Act of 1960 whether it is legislative or administrative in nature and scope of interference by this Court in that function.
2. The Chhattisgarh Shaskiya Sevak (Adhivarshiki-Ayu) (Sanshodhan) Ordinance, 2013 (for short "the Ordinance of 2013") was promulgated on 23rd August, 2013. It was an Ordinance to amend Chhattisgarh Shaskiya Sevak (Adhivarshiki-Ayu) Adhiniyam, 1967 by which the Rule 56 of the Fundamental Rule was amended and age of superannuation of the government servant was enhanced from 60 to 62 years. Thereafter, in compliance of the said Ordinance, the State of Chhattisgarh has issued the circular on 23rd August, 2013 stating inter-alia that the Government has taken a decision that according to the Ordinance of 2013 age of superannuation of employees working in the local bodies namely Municipal Council and Corporation etc. be amended accordingly. The Registrar, Co-operative Societies following the circular of the State Government and in exercise of powers conferred under Section 55(1) of the Chhattisgarh C
M.P. Vidyut Karmachari Sangh v. M.P. Electricity Board
Osmania University v. V.S. Muthurangam
L. Lakshmana Rao v. State of Karnataka
Chandra Singh v. State Rajasthan
Sundarjas Kanyalal Bhathija & others v. The Collector, Thane, Maharashtra
Union of India and another v. Cynamide India Limited and another (1987) 2 SCC 720
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.