SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Chh) 185

DEEPAK GUPTA
Mirabai @ Kachra Bai, W/o Dongar Ram, D/o Lakhan Kalar – Appellant
Versus
Dongar Ram, S/o Panch Ram Nayak – Respondent


ORDER :

1. Both the above-mentioned petitions are being disposed of by the following common order as the issue involved therein is common. For the sake of convenience in deciding both the cases, Criminal Revision No.180 of 2005 is taken-up as a lead case.

2. Petitioner Mirabai alias Kachra Bai claiming herself to be the wife of Respondent Dongar Ram on the basis of custom of getting married by wearing churis (bangles) filed a petition, being Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.72 of 1998 before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khairagarh claiming maintenance for herself and her daughter Purnima, who is Petitioner No.2 in the instant petition, i.e., Criminal Revision No.180 of 2005.

3. The Trial Court granted maintenance of Rs.500/- per month to Petitioner/wife Mirabai and that of Rs.300/- per month to Petitioner/daughter Purnima. But, as far as the daughter is concerned, it was clarified that she would be entitled for the maintenance only till she attains majority.

4. Aggrieved by the order of the Trial Court, husband and father Dongar Ram/Respondent herein filed a revision, being Criminal Revision No.70 of 2004 before the Additional Sessions Judge, Khairagarh. The Additional Sessi






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top