DEEPAK GUPTA
Mirabai @ Kachra Bai, W/o Dongar Ram, D/o Lakhan Kalar – Appellant
Versus
Dongar Ram, S/o Panch Ram Nayak – Respondent
1. Both the above-mentioned petitions are being disposed of by the following common order as the issue involved therein is common. For the sake of convenience in deciding both the cases, Criminal Revision No.180 of 2005 is taken-up as a lead case.
2. Petitioner Mirabai alias Kachra Bai claiming herself to be the wife of Respondent Dongar Ram on the basis of custom of getting married by wearing churis (bangles) filed a petition, being Miscellaneous Criminal Case No.72 of 1998 before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khairagarh claiming maintenance for herself and her daughter Purnima, who is Petitioner No.2 in the instant petition, i.e., Criminal Revision No.180 of 2005.
3. The Trial Court granted maintenance of Rs.500/- per month to Petitioner/wife Mirabai and that of Rs.300/- per month to Petitioner/daughter Purnima. But, as far as the daughter is concerned, it was clarified that she would be entitled for the maintenance only till she attains majority.
4. Aggrieved by the order of the Trial Court, husband and father Dongar Ram/Respondent herein filed a revision, being Criminal Revision No.70 of 2004 before the Additional Sessions Judge, Khairagarh. The Additional Sessi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.