PRITINKER DIWAKER, RAJENDRA CHANDRA SINGH SAMANT
Kunti w/o late Mewalal – Appellant
Versus
Ghoorsai S/o Purshotam – Respondent
R.C.S. Samant, J.
This appeal has been preferred under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984 against the impugned judgment dated 10.9.2013 passed by the Judge, Family Court Camp Court, Katghora, Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh in M.J.C. No. 2 of 2012, by which an application filed by the appellant under Section 19 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 (for short "the Act") was rejected.
2. The facts of the case are that the appellant was married to son of the respondent in the year 1999. Out of this wedlock, two sons were born and on the date of filing of the application under Section 19 of the Act, they were aged about 14 and 16 years, respectively. Husband of the appellant, namely, Mewalal expired on 8.12.2009. The appellant was driven out of the matrimonial home during the lifetime of her husband Mewalal. On an application filed by her for maintenance, by order of the Court, deceased Mewalal used to pay Rs.600/- per month as maintenance. After the death of her husband, respondent/ father-in-law neglected in maintenance of the appellant. Respondent is the owner of about 10 acres of agricultural land and apart from that he is engaged in business of veget
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.