SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Chh) 305

P.SAM KOSHY
Raj Kumari Badwani – Appellant
Versus
Collector, Ex-Officio Chairman PCPNDT Act – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sunil Otwani
For the Respondents: U.K.S. Chandel

ORDER :

P. Sam Koshy, J.

1. Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 25.06.2015 passed by the First Additional Sessions Judge, Raipur in Criminal Revision No. 160/2015 whereby while rejecting the revision, the sessions Judge has affirmed the order dated 04.03.2015 passed by the Special Railway Magistrate Raipur ordering for registration of a complaint against the petitioner for violation of the provisions of The Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the PCPNDT Act'). The facts in brief is that the Deputy Collector, Raipur, on 04.03.2015 filed a complaint before the court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raipur under Section 28 of the PCPNDT Act alleging that she had accompanied NINC Team who had come from Delhi for inspecting the Sonography Centers at Raipur. In the course on 22.12.2014, Bombay Diagnostic centre belonging to the petitioner was inspected and in the course of inspection, the team found the petitioners to have violated the provisions of Section 4(3)(v) of the PCPNDT Act to the extent that the records available at the centre were not in the proper format as is required under the Act a
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top