SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Chh) 322

PRITINKER DIWAKER, CHANDRA BHUSHAN BAJPAI
Juganoo alias Karim Khan – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Y.C. Sharma, Saurabh Dangi, Somnath Verma and Arun Kochar
For the Respondent: Ashish Shukla

JUDGMENT :

Chandra Bhushan Bajpai, J.

By this judgment, Cri. Appeal No. 775/2001 and Cri. Appeal No. 801/2001 are being disposed of jointly.

2. Accused No. 4 Mukesh Sharma has preferred Cri. Appeal No. 775/2001 along with other appellants and subsequently he has also preferred Cri. A. No. 801/2001. In these circumstances, Cri. A. No. 801/2001 filed subsequently by appellant Mukesh Sharma is dismissed being unnecessary.

3. These appeals arising out of the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 7-8-2001 passed by the 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Bilaspur in Sessions Trial No. 352/ 1999 convicting and sentencing all the seven appellants as under :-

Section IPC

Sentence RI for

Fine Rs.

Sentence in default of payment of fine additional RI for

147

6 months

200/-

1 month

148

1 year

500/-

1 month

450/149

5 years

1,000/-

1 month

323/149

6 months

300/-

1 month

302/149

Imprisonment for life

5,000/-

1 month

All the substantive jail sentences are directed to run separately.

The trial Court acquitted all the above appellants of the offenc





















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top