Chandra Bhushan Bajpai, J.

Being aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 11-02-2003 passed by the Vth Additional Sessions Judge, Bilaspur, C.G. whereby and where under the learned trial Court acquitted respondents 1 to 8 for the charges framed under Sections 147, 148, 307 read with Section 149, Section 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short 'the IPC') by affording benefit of doubt, petitioner/applicant Raju, son of deceased Dhansai and brother of Rajkumar and Ganesh (deceased in the said incident) and also brother of injured eye-witness Janakibai (PW-5) had filed the instant criminal revision under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short 'the Code') against the private respondents 1 to 8.

2. The instant revision is filed on the ground that conclusion drawn by the trial Court is unwarranted by the evidence available on record, unreasonable, erroneous and also perverse, hence, liable to be set aside. As the witnesses corroborated each other and the trial Court erred in not considering the statement of the witnesses, the view taken by the trial Court is perverse, infirm and palpably erroneous view. Though t