SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Chh) 454

DEEPAK GUPTA, SANJAY K.AGRAWAL
Shyamlal – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh (Now State of Chhattisgarh) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : S.P. Singh, Mr. Arun Kochar
For the State : Mr. Vinod Deshmukh

ORDER :

Shyamlal (A1) and Satendra Kumar Tiwari (A2) [father and son] were prosecuted for commission of offence punishable under Section 302, 307 and 307 of the IPC respectively in S.T.No.91/93 and vide jugment of conviction and order of sentence dated 13.1.1999 passed by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Raipur, appellant No. 1 was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and fine of Rs. 1000/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo R.I. for three months under Section 302 of the IPC and R.I. for ten years and fine of 1000/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo R.I. for three months under Section 307 of the IPC and appellant No.2 was sentenced to undergo R.I. for ten years and fine of Rs. 1000/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo R.I. for three months under Section 307 of the IPC.

2. Case of the prosecution as unfolded during the course of trial are as under :-

(i) Appellant No. 1 and complaint father at the time of date of occurrence were serving in the Police Department and complainant-s father had already retired a week's before the d








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top