IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
Anil Kumar Shukla, J.
Barsadi, S/o Khorbahara, and Anr. - Applicants
Versus
The State of Chhattisgarh through the District Magistrate Mahasamund (C.G.) - Respondent
Criminal Revision No. 359 of 2004
Decided on : 11-01-2017
Arms Act - Sections 25 (1B)(b) and 27 (1) - Constitution of India,1950 - Article 13(3)(a) – Indian Penal Code,1860 - Section 326 – Appeal Against conviction - First Information Report - Prosecution case in short is that on at about complainant along with his brother was returning home after selling mutton at Near wine shop - When they reached near Lodge applicants met them there and said that he had become - Thereafter Applicant took out a sword from his back and assaulted him on his hand with a sword due to which blood began to ooze out from his hand intervened and went to house to inform about incident - On returning to spot came to know that had take to hospital therefore he also went to hospital where he lodged – Held, Learned counsel appearing for applicants and present case is that photocopy of the relevant notification is available on the record of trial Court and there is a mention of the notification at serial No. 8 of list of documents enclosed to final report which was filed before the Chief Judicial Magistrate - In the present case seized iron sword had been produced before trial Court which was proved by in trial Court as Article-A has also stated about the seizure of sword (Article-A) who examined the seized sword and gave his report vide in his deposition - Revision is dismissed
Shri Anil Kumar Shukla, J.
1. This revision is directed against the judgment dated 07.07.2004 passed by the First Additional Sessions Judge, Mahasamund in Criminal Appeal No. 269/2002 by which the learned Additional Sessions Judge, modifying the judgment dated 24.10.2002 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mahasamund in Criminal Case No. 1141/2000 convicting applicant No.1, Barsadi under section 326 of IPC and under sections 25 (1B)(b) and 27 (1) of the Arms Act and Applicant No. 2, Mast Ram under section 326/34 of IPC, convicted and sentenced the applicants as follows -
Conviction
Sentence
Under Section 324 IPC
Rigorous Imprisonment for one year and Fine of Rs. 1000/-,
Under Section 25(1B)(b) of the Arms Act
Rigorous Imprisonment for one year and Fine of Rs. 500/-
Under Section 27(1) of the Arms Act
Rigorous Imprisonment for three years and Fine of Rs. 500/- All the sentences are directed to run concurrently. (Fine amount has already been deposited)
Applicant No.2, Mast Ram -
Conviction
Sentence
Under Section 324/34
IPC Rigorous Imprisonment for one year and Fine of Rs. 1000/-
(Fine amount has already been deposited)
2. Being aggrieved by the judgment passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, the applicants have preferred the present Criminal revision.
3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on 29.08.2000, at about 1.30 PM, complainant Bajirao, along with his brother Dulla, was returning home after selling mutton at Swami Chowk, Mahasamund near wine shop. When they reached near Ashirwad Lodge, the applicants met them there and said Bajirao that he had become proudish. Thereafter, Applicant Barsadi took out a sword from his back and assaulted him on his hand with a sword due to which blood began to ooze out from his hand. Rajan Dewar intervened and Dheeraj Dewar went to the house of Bajirao to inform about the incident. On returning to the spot, Dheeraj Dewar came to know that Dulla had taken Bajirao to the hospital, therefore, he also went to the hospital, where he lodged Dehatinalishi (Ex.P-1). On the basis of the Dehatinalishi, later on, First Information Report (Ex.P-9) was registered by Police Station Mahasamund against applicants Barsadi and Mast Ram for offence punishable under section 324/34 IPC. Complainant Bajirao was medically examined. Dr. Girdharilal Chandrakar (PW-7) examined complainant Bajirao and gave his report (Ex.P-4) in which he found one incised wound in the size of 10X5 cms X bone deep near thumb of left hand in the front portion and he also found that the blood vein was cut and there was sever bleeding. He had advised for x-ray for left hand. He opined that the injuries were grievous in nature. X-ray report is Ex.P-5. On 31.08.2000 the Police seized blood stained full-pant and shirt of complainant Bajirao vide Ex.P-3 and on 04.09.2000 seized a sword from applicant Barsadi vide Ex.P-2. This sword was sent to Dr. Girdharilal Chandrakar (PW-7) vide Ex.P-6(A) for examination, who, after examination of the same, gave his report Ex.P-6. Statements of witnesses were recorded.
4. After completion of the investigation, charge sheet was filed against the applicants in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mahasamund. Charges were framed against the applicants. They denied the guilt and claimed for trial. After conducting the trial, the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mahasamund convicted applicant Barsadi under section 326 of IPC and under sections 25(1B) (b) and 27(1) of the Arms Act and sentenced him there under to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay fine of Rs. 1000/-, rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay fine of Rs. 500/- and rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay fine of Rs. 500/-. The learned Chief Judicial Magistrate convicted applicant Mast Ram under section 326/34
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.