SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Chh) 135

ANIL KUMAR SHUKLA
Barsadi, S/o Khorbahara – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh through the District Magistrate Mahasamund (C. G. ) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicants :Smt. Indira Tripathi, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Shri Neeraj Sharma, Dy. G.A.

ORDER :

Shri Anil Kumar Shukla, J.

1. This revision is directed against the judgment dated 07.07.2004 passed by the First Additional Sessions Judge, Mahasamund in Criminal Appeal No. 269/2002 by which the learned Additional Sessions Judge, modifying the judgment dated 24.10.2002 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mahasamund in Criminal Case No. 1141/2000 convicting applicant No.1, Barsadi under section 326 of IPC and under sections 25 (1B)(b) and 27 (1) of the Arms Act and Applicant No. 2, Mast Ram under section 326/34 of IPC, convicted and sentenced the applicants as follows -

      

Conviction

Sentence

Under Section 324 IPC

Rigorous Imprisonment for one year and Fine of Rs. 1000/-,

Under Section 25(1B)(b) of the Arms Act

Rigorous Imprisonment for one year and Fine of Rs. 500/-

Under Section 27(1) of the Arms Act

Rigorous Imprisonment for three years and Fine of Rs. 500/- All the sentences are directed to run concurrently. (Fine amount has already been deposited)

Applicant No.2, Mast Ram -

Conviction

Sentence

Under Section 32










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top