ANIL KUMAR SHUKLA
Barsadi, S/o Khorbahara – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh through the District Magistrate Mahasamund (C. G. ) – Respondent
Shri Anil Kumar Shukla, J.
1. This revision is directed against the judgment dated 07.07.2004 passed by the First Additional Sessions Judge, Mahasamund in Criminal Appeal No. 269/2002 by which the learned Additional Sessions Judge, modifying the judgment dated 24.10.2002 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mahasamund in Criminal Case No. 1141/2000 convicting applicant No.1, Barsadi under section 326 of IPC and under sections 25 (1B)(b) and 27 (1) of the Arms Act and Applicant No. 2, Mast Ram under section 326/34 of IPC, convicted and sentenced the applicants as follows -
Conviction
Sentence
Under Section 324 IPC
Rigorous Imprisonment for one year and Fine of Rs. 1000/-,
Under Section 25(1B)(b) of the Arms Act
Rigorous Imprisonment for one year and Fine of Rs. 500/-
Under Section 27(1) of the Arms Act
Rigorous Imprisonment for three years and Fine of Rs. 500/- All the sentences are directed to run concurrently. (Fine amount has already been deposited)
Applicant No.2, Mast Ram -
Conviction
Sentence
Under Section 32
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.