2017 Supreme(Chh) 616
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
SANJAY K. AGRAWAL, J.
Steel Authority of India Ltd., Represented by Managing Director - Petitioner
Versus
The Additional Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Raipur - Respondents
Writ Petition No.3969 of 2005
Decided On : 07-07-2017
For the Petitioner:Mr. M.C. Jain and Mr. Ashok Patil, Advocates.
For the Respondents:Mr. Arun Sao, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. Shashank Thakur, Government Advocate.
Headnote:
Companies Act, 1956 - Section 617- M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958 - Section 17 (3) (b) (ii) - Tax on royalty on mineral right - Interim order - Petitioner is a company incorporated and registered under provisions of Indian Companies Act, 1956 - It is a Government company within the meaning of Section 617 of Companies Act, 1956 - It has an integrated steel plant at where iron and steel are manufactured - For manufacture of iron and steel various raw materials including iron ore coking coal lime stone etc., are used as raw materials - These goods are specified as raw materials in registration certificate of the petitioner - It is case of the petitioner that in conformity with the policy to tax raw materials at a lower rate under Sales Tax Act and also under Act, 1976 general rate of entry tax on raw material was under Section 4 of the said Act - Held, This shows that no reasonable opportunity of being heard to oppose levy of tax as contemplated by Section 17 (3) (b) of Act was afforded to petitioner - Specific ground was raised before revision authority that no show cause notice was issued before levy of penalty and thus imposition of penalty is not justified but revision authority also cursorily and casually noted the submissions but did not consider the plea raised by petitioner and simply stated that no satisfactory explanation has been offered - It is neither considered in detail nor plea of petitioner has been answered that no reasonable opportunity of showing cause was afforded to him before imposing penalty and though partly reduced penalty to extent of so made by assessing authority - Writ petition is allowed
1. Impugning legality, validity and correctness of the order passed by the Additional Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Raipur, whereby and where under the said revisional authority has affirmed the order of the assessing authority relating to assessment of entry tax for the period from 1-4-1990 to 31-3- 1991 levying penalty under Section 17 (3) (b) (ii) of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958 (for short, 'the Act, 1958') and the Rules made there under read with Section 13 of the M.P. Sthaniya Kshetra Me Mal Ke Pravesh Par Kar Adhiniyam, 1976 (for short, 'the Act, 1976') and thereby affirmed the levy of penalty to the extent of Rs.4,09,09,903/-.
2. Essential facts leading to passing of the impugned order are as under: -
(2.1) The petitioner is a company incorporated and registered under the provisions of the Indian Companies Act, 1956. It is a Government company within the meaning of Section 617 of the Companies Act, 1956. It has an integrated steel plant at Bhilai where iron and steel are manufactured. For manufacture of iron and steel, various raw materials including iron ore, coking coal, lime stone etc., are used as raw materials. These goods are specified as raw materials in the registration certificate of the petitioner.
(2.2) It is the case of the petitioner that in conformity with the policy to tax raw materials at a lower rate under the Sales Tax Act and also under the Act, 1976, general rate of entry tax on raw material was 7% under Section 4 of the said Act. The State Government could specify local area or areas and the goods for levy of entry tax at a rate not exceeding 10% by notification under Section 4A of the Act, 1976. The petitioner Company purchased low silica lime stone as one of its raw materials for production of steel and they were paying entry tax regularly on it on the entry of low silica lime stone into the local area of Bhilai up to December, 1990. For the month of January, 1991, tax was due on 10-2-1991, but the M.P. High Court on 6-2-1991 delivered a judgment in the case of Makers Development Service (Pvt.) Ltd. v. State Govt. of Madhya Pradesh and Others, [1991] 24 VKN—289 declaring the levy of entry tax on lime stone as unconstitutional on the ground that entry tax on lime stone was a tax on royalty on mineral right and was beyond the legislative competence of the State Legislature while following the decision of Their Lordships of the Supreme Court in the matter of The India Cement Ltd. etc. etc. v. State of Tamil Nadu, [1991] 24 VKN 269 (SC) : AIR 1990 SC 85. Likewise, the cess on mineral was declared ultra vires by the M.P. High Court in the matter of A.C.C. Ltd. v. State of M.P., [1991] 24 VKN—293 decided on 16-2-1991. Therefore, the petitioner Company in view of the decision in Makers Development Service (supra) discontinued payment of entry tax on lime stone from the month of January, 1991, though payment for the month of January, 1991 was due to be paid on 10-2-1991. Thereafter, the petitioner filed writ petition in the M.P. High Court in which interim order was granted in favour of the petitioner and attempt on the part of the State Government to get the interim order vacated remained illusory but later-on, looking to the gravity and taking into account the long life of litigation, a settlement was arrived at and a memorandum of understanding (MOU) was reduced into writing on 11th/12th February, 1993 and thereafter, the entry tax liability for the 4th quarter of the year 1990-91 was paid in the year 1993- 94 and withdrawn all its pending proceedings and tax liability for 1991-92 and 1992-93 was also paid. Pursuant to the memorandum of understanding, the State Government issued circular waiving levy of entry tax and penalty for the period from 1-4-1991 to 31-3-1994, but inadvertently, the period from 1-1- 1991 to 31-3-1991 was left to be included and that has given rise to the present dispute.
(2.3) It was further pleaded that the petitioner filed returns for the quarter ending on 31-12-199