SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Chh) 18

GOUTAM BHADURI
Simeya Hariramani S/o Dilip Hariramani – Appellant
Versus
Bank of Baroda Branch Baloda Bazar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Mr. Adil Minhaj, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Ankit Singhal, Advocate.

ORDER :

1. Heard.

2. The present petition is against the order dated 28th June 2017 passed by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Balado Bazar in Criminal Revision No.H-23/2017 (Simeya Hariramani and another Vs. Bank of Baroda) whereby the charge framed by the CJM, Baloda Bazar vide order dated 10.02.2017 passed in Criminal Case no.54/2016 has been maintained. 3. As per the case of petitioner, on 07.02.2015 a complaint was filed by the Bank of Baroda through its Branch Manager of Baloda Bazar u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 on 07.12.2015 when 3 cheques issued by the petitioner were dishonoured. The details of cheques are as under :-

S. No

Bank & A/c No.

Drawer

Drawee

Cheq No. & date

Amount Rs.

Date of dishonour

1.

HDFC Bank 01528630000254

Global Packaging

Global Packaging

000502, dt.17.10.15

25 Lakhs

17.10.15

2.

HDFC Bank0152863000254

Global Packaging

Global Packaging

00503 dt.27.10.15

25 Lakhs

27.10.15

3.

HDFC Bank 0152863000254

Global Packaging

Global Packaging

000504 dt.31.10.15

25 lakhs

31.10.15

4. After the compla












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top