SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Chh) 101

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
PRITINKER DIWAKER, SANJAY AGRAWAL, JJ.
Ritesh Sahu s/o Keshavchand Sahu - Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh - Respondent
CRA No. 1065, 1228 of 2014
CRA No. 428 of 2015
Decided on : 02-02-2018

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants :Shri Awadh Tripathi, Shri M.K. Sinha and Shri Ajay Ayachi, Advocates
For the Respondent: Shri Vivek Sharma, GA

Headnote:

Arms Act - Section 25 and 27 - Code of Criminal Procedure,1973 - Section 313 - Conviction - Complainant is proprietor of a jewelry shop styled as Jewelers situated at Main Road opposite District lodged a written report to the effect that on that day in between dacoits – some masked and some not committed dacoity of gold and silver jewelry worth Lakhs and then moved away on a vehicle - Further case of prosecution is that minutes thereafter when complainant return home accused persons caused injuries to him. They are also alleged to have caused gun shot injury to watchman of the complainants shop - On the basis of this written report, FIR (Ex.P-1) was registered on the same day at under Sections 395 IPC and 25, 27 Arms Act against unknown persons - Injured was medically examined by vide report (Ex. P-33) mentioning typical fire-arm wound and lacerated wound with bleeding on right medial side of calf muscle and lead core was found inside the calf - Held, Appellant in Criminal Appeal he has just been identified in Court to be resident of same area and the witnesses have categorically stated that he was not present at time of incident with the people who committed dacoity and no overt act has been attributed to him - Further there is no evidence against him that he in any manner hatched the alleged criminal conspiracy – Therefore ingredients of Section 120-B/34 IPC are not attracted to the case in hand and being so conviction of accused being not wellfounded is liable to be set aside - In sum and substance conviction of accused/appellants under Sections 395/34 and 120-B/34 IPC is maintained. They however are acquitted of the charge under Section 397/34 IPC and 27 of the Arms Act for the reasons adumbrated above - As regards sentence imposed on accused/appellants under Section 395/34 and 120-B/34 IPC keeping in mind facts and circumstances of the case and the decisions of the Apex Court referred to by the counsel for accused/appellants - Criminal Appeal allowed

JUDGMENT :

Pritinker Diwaker, J

As the aforesaid three Criminal Appeals arise out of the same judgment dated 30.09.2014 passed by Additional Sessions Judge Sarangarh, District Raigarh in Sessions Trial No. 16/2012 convicting and sentencing the accused/appellants as described below, they are being disposed of by this common judgment.

Accused/Appellant

Conviction (U/s)

Sentence

Ritesh Sahu

120-B/34 IPC

RI for 10 years with fine of Rs. 1,000/ plus default stipulation

Sanjay Pradhan, Mahesh Bagarti, Naveen Thakur, Munna Sahu, Satish Kumar Sahu, Vikas Chand Rai and Amit Das

395/34 IPC

RI for 10 years with fine of Rs. 1,000/ plus default stipulation

 

397/34 IPC

RI for 10 years

 

27 Arms Act

RI for 03 years with fine of Rs. 500/- plus default stipulation

 

120-B IPC

RI for 10 years with fine of Rs.1,000/- plus default stipulation

2. As per the case of prosecution, complainant Arun Kumar Swarnkar (PW-1) is the proprietor of a jewelry shop styled as Ruchi Jewelers, situated at Main Road, opposite Gaytri Mandir, Baramkela, District Raigarh, who on 18.02.2012 lodged a written report (Ex. P-2) to the effect that on that day in between 9.30 and 10.30 PM, 4-5 dacoits – some masked and some not, committed dacoity of gold and silver jewelry worth Rs. 40–50 Lakhs and then moved away on a Tavera vehicle. Further case of the prosecution is that 10-15 minutes thereafter when the complainant return home, the accused persons caused injuries to him. They are also alleged to have caused gun shot injury to Jasaldas (PW-2) - the watchman of the complainant's shop. On the basis of this written report, FIR (Ex.P-1) was registered on the same day at 11.00 PM under Sections 395 IPC and 25, 27 Arms Act against 4-5 unknown persons. Injured Jasaldas (PW-2) was medically examined by Dr. D. Bohra (PW-14) vide report (Ex. P-33) mentioning typical fire-arm wound and lacerated wound with bleeding on right medial side of calf muscle and lead core was found inside the calf. Likewise, medical report (Ex.P-34) of Simran Swarnkar (PW-11) given by PW-14 shows bruise over vertex of scalp. Medical report (Ex. 35) of Rajkumari Swarnkar (PW-9) shows bruises and abrasion over left elbow and right parietal region of scalp. During investigation, on the basis of call details the accused persons were apprehended on 4.3.2012 and arrested formally on 5.3.2012. On the basis of memorandum (Ex.P-10) of accused Sanjay Pradhan recorded on 4.3.2012, seizure of various articles like cots, almirah, fridge, TV, cycle, chair, RC book of Tavera car, number plates of vehicles, tyre of Jylo car, jacket, showcase meant for keeping ornament, monkey cap, cash of Rs. 75,000/- etc was made under Ex. P-15, P-16 and P-17. On the basis of memorandum (Ex.P-14) of accused Mahesh Bagarti recorded on 4.3.2012, seizure of various articles like Pulsor motorcycle, cash of Rs. 80,000/-, pistols and cartridges was made under Ex. P-20. On the basis of memorandum (Ex.P-12) of accused Navin Thakur recorded on 4.3.2012, seizure of one Nokia mobile phone and cash of Rs. 50,000/- was made under Ex. P-22. On the basis of memorandum (Ex.P-08) of accused Munna Sahu alias Pilot recorded on 4.3.2012, seizure of one motorcycle, cash of Rs. 20,000/- and one micromax mobile was made under Ex. P-21. On the basis of memorandum (Ex.P-13) of accused Satish Sahu alias Rocky recorded on 4.3.2012, seizure of one micromax mobile phone and cash of Rs.1,50,000/- was made under Ex. P-19. On the basis of memorandum (Ex.P-09) of accused Vikas Chand Rai @ Vikki @ Deepak recorded on 4.3.2012, seizure of one Tavera car said to be used in the incident, cash of Rs. 01,25,000/- and a Spice mobile phone was made under Ex. P-18 and Ex. P-23.

On the basis of memorandum (Ex.P-11) of accused Ritesh Sahu recorded on 5.3.2012, no seizure is said to have been made from him. On t













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top