SANJAY K.AGRAWAL
Ramlal Nag – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.
Since common question of law and facts are involved in these writ petitions, they are heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.
2. The petitioners caste certificates were verified by the District Level Certificate Verification Committee constituted under the Chhattisgarh Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes (Regulation of Social Status Certification) Act, 2013 (hereinafter called as 'Act of 2013') on 31.7.2013 and 20.3.2014 respectively and that order has attained finality as there was no challenge of that certificates. Thereafter, some complaints were made to the Collector, Dantewada against the petitioners. The Collector referred the matter to the Sub Divisional Officer (R.), Dantewada and the said Sub-Divisional Officer issued the notices to the petitioners for verification of their caste certificates on 20.2.2016 (Annexure P/1 in all cases), against which, these writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India have been filed by the petitioners.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that under the Act of 2013, only District Legal Certificates Verification Committee constituted und
State of Uttar Pradesh v. Brahm Datt Sharma and Anr. AIR 1987 SC 943
Sudhakar Vithal Kumbhare v. State of Maharashtra and others (2004) 9 SCC 481
Special Director and Another v. Mohd. Ghulam Ghouse and another (2004) 3 SCC 440
Union of India and Another v. Kunisetty Satyanarayana 2006 (12) Scale 262
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.