IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Prashant Kumar Mishra, JJ.
Ku. Pratibha Sinha D/o. B.S. Sinha - Petitioner
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Health & Family Welfare Department & Ors. - Respondent
WPC Nos. 931, 994, 995, 1001, 1318, 1321, 1612, 1624, 1625, 1737, 1964, 2421, 2559, 2774, 2915, 2924, 2937, 3095, 3096, 3115, 3411 of 2017; 964, 967, 969, 970, 971, 974, 976, 1058, 1107, 1108, 1109, 1127, 1186, 1310, 1495, 1547, 1555, 1583, 1588, 1593, 1627 & 1959 of 2018
Decided On : 06-08-2018
Chhattisgarh Medical, Dental, Physiotherapy Graduation Entrance Examination Rules, 2011 - Rule 11 (1), (2), (3), (7) and (10) - Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 14 or Article 19(1)(g) - Bond for Candidate taking admission in MBBS Course to serve under State Government - Admission in MBBS Course - Amount of Bond - Penalty for non-compliance of Rule 11(1) - Petitioners want Rule to be struck down as null and void being unconstitutional, if not arbitrary – We reproduce hereunder relevant rules (both in English & Hindi version), at very outset, to understand why so many petitioners are before this Court and what is coming in their way after successful completion of MBBS Course - Held, If State of Chhattisgarh while providing admission and providing subsidized education to such students has decided as an objective and as a policy to take work from such candidates for a period of 2 years in rural areas and in lieu thereof they have imposed notional amount as a bond condition, in case a person wants to opt out or breach same, same cannot be struck down on ground of being violative of Article 14 or Article 19(1)(g) of Constitution of India - Paramount objective behind Rule 11 is to provide medical service to the people in villages and Government Primary Heath Centres situated in Rural Areas by utilising services of such MBBS Doctors - To ensure its enforcement, execution of bond has been incorporated as a condition to admission - Effort of State was to only enforce object and not to create any impediment in choice of career or advantages after completion of course of MBBS – Court are not impressed by lines of arguments made on behalf of petitioners that Rule 11 falls foul of any of conditions under which it can be struck down as unconstitutional or ultra vires - All writ petitions dismissed.
Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.
1. Heard.
2. In these batch of Writ Petitions, the common attack is directed against Rule 11 (1), (2), (3), (7) and (10) of the Chhattisgarh Medical, Dental, Physiotherapy Graduation Entrance Examination Rules, 2011 (in short “the Rules, 2011”) as well as Chhattisgarh Medical, Dental, Physiotherapy Graduation Entrance Examination Rules, 2012 (for short “the Rules, 2012”).
3. The petitioners want the Rule to be struck down as null and void being unconstitutional, if not arbitrary.
4. We reproduce hereunder the relevant rules (both in English & Hindi version), at the very outset, to understand why so many petitioners are before this Court and what is coming in their way after successful completion of MBBS Course :
“11. Bond for the Candidate taking admission in MBBS Course to serve under State Government-
(1) It shall be mandatory for the student taking admission in MBBS Course that he/she has to serve as medical officer in Government Health Centre or in the Institution for a period of 2 years in rural areas as notified by Government, on successful completion of graduation course. This shall be abide mandatory for other courses.
e. Bond to serve under the Government:- At the time of admission the candidate has to submit a bond in prescribed proforma that he/she is agree with the provisions of Rule 11(1) and if he/she opts for a option not to work under government then apart from the bond amount as mentioned in Rule 11(3) he/she will deposit the entire amount of any stipend/scholarship having paid to him/her during the period of his/her study by the State Government. Only after the deposition of entire payable amount by him/her, the candidate shall be issued with No-objection Certificate as prescribed.
(3) Amount of Bond- The amount of Bond for the Candidate of unreserved category is of Rs.5,00,000/- and for the students of reserved category and the bond amount is Rs.3,00,000/- has to be paid.
xxx xxx xxx
(7) After fulfilling the service term as per rule 11(1) or after depositing the entire payable amount as per rule 11(3) as the case may be, (depending on the option taken by candidate), the commissioner shall issue No-objection Certificate to the candidate that provisions of rule 11(1).
xxx xxx xxx
(9) Penalty for non-compliance of Rule 11(1):- It any candidate opts to serve under the government and found guilty of non-compliance of Rule 11(1) then apart from the entire amount of Bond as mentioned in Rule 11(3), the recovery of entire amount of any scholar ship paid to him/her during the period of the course of his/her study by State Government or the recovery of entire amount of pay paid to him/her shall be made as dues of land-Revenue from the candidate. The No Objection Certificate as mentioned in Rule 11(7) shall not be given to such candidate unless the entire payable amount has been recovered.”
^^11- jkT; 'kklu ds v/khu lsok djus gsrq ,e-ch-ch-,l- ikB~;Øe esa izos'k ysus okys vH;FkhZ gsrq ca/ki= ¼ckW.M½ &
¼1½ ,e-ch-ch-,l- ikB~;Øe esa izos'k ysus okys Nk= ds fy, vfuok;Z gksxk fd og Lukrd ikB~;Øe lQyrkiwoZd iw.kZ djus ds ckn] 'kklu }kjk vf/klwfpr fd, x, xzkeh.k {ks=ksa esa nks o”kksZa dh dkykof/k rd fpfdRlk vf/kdkjh ds :i esa 'kkldh; LokLF; dsUnz vFkok laLFkk esa dk;Z djsxk A vU; ikB~;Øeksa gsrq ;g vfuok;Zrk ugha gksxh A
¼2½ 'kklu ds v/khu dk;Z djus ds fy, ca/ki= ¼ckW.M½%& izos'k ds le; vH;FkhZ dks fu/kkZfjr izi= esa ;g ca/ki= izLrqr djuk gksxk] fd os fu;e 11¼1½ ds izko/kkuksa ls lger gS vkSj ;fn os 'kklu ds v/khu dk;Z u djus dk fodYi dk p;u djrs gSa] rks os fu;e 11¼3½ esa ;Fkk fu/kkZfjr ca/ki= jkf'k ds vykok jkT; 'kklu }kjk mlds v/;;u dh vof/k ds nkSjku mls Hkqxrku fd;s x, fdlh Hkh Nk=o`fRr@f'k";o`fŸk dh lEiw.kZ jkf'k dks tek djsaxs A mlds }kjk lEiw.kZ ns; jkf'k ds tek gksus ds ckn gh vH;FkhZ dks ;Fkk fu/kkZfjr vukifRr izek.k i= tkjh fd;k tk,xk A
¼3½ ca/ki= ¼ckW.M½ dh jkf'k %& vukjf{kr Js.kh ds vH;FkhZ ds fy, ca/ki= ¼ck.M½ dh jkf'k :i;s 5]00]000@& ,oa vkjf{kr Js.kh ds Nk= ds fy, ca/ki= ¼ck.M½ dh jkf'k :i;s 3
Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samity and others Vs. State of W.B. and another
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.