SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Chh) 633

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
GOUTAM BHADURI, J.
Hemant Parasar, S/o Shri V.S. Parasar - Appellant
Versus
Smt.Kamini Parasar, Wife of Hemant Parasar - Respondent
FA No. 147 of 2001
Decided On : 26-11-2018

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Shri D.C. Verma, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Shri Avinash Mishra, Advocate.

Headnote:

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Section 13 (1) (i-b) - Divorce - Decree Of Divorce - Facts, reveal that marriage of appellant and respondent took place at Bhilai according to Hindu rituals, thereafter, respondent/wife joined her matrimonial home and started living there - It was pleaded that father and mother of boy were working at Andhra Pradesh and they used to visit there home at Bhilai within a gap of more than three months - It was stated that after marriage, wife got an opportunity of job and was selected as an Assistant Professor in education department and she had to join her posting somewhere else other than her place of matrimoinal home - It was stated that husband suggested wife not to join her place of posting away from Bhilai but she did not hear advice and however supported by her family members and without consent eventually she joined her job at other place - Before that during period of cohabitation a girl child was born - It was further pleaded that mother of appellant while was going to Delhi, wife went along with her and from Jhansi she was accompanied by her brother and she went to Gwalior - It was stated that according to understanding she was to join back her mother-in-law while she was coming back from Delhi, but she did not join and instead joined her job - It was pleaded therefore, non-applicant/wife without any sufficient cause has left husband and since was working against wish of husband at different place of her matrimonial home, thus has deserted husband, therefore, marriage be annulled by decree of - Petition for divorce was preferred by husband – Held, Evidence and averments of petition shows that because of job against wishes of husband claims that wife has deserted - Except that no ground of any mental cruelty has been pleaded or evidence has been adduced - Evidence is also confined to fact that wife got job outside and thereafter she joined there, thereby separation was caused and further she refused to comeback by leaving her job - Irretrievable breakdown of marriage on ground of mental cruelty neither been pleaded nor proved - In background of this case if decree of divorce is granted on ground of irretrievable background, it would amount to succumb to eventual destination which husband wanted to achieve on a ground of desertion by circumventing cause - As such those grounds in facts of case cannot be entertained - Appeal Dismissed.

ORDER :

1. Heard.

2. The present appeal arises out of an order dated 04.10.2001 passed in civil Suit No.14-A/1999 passed by the 3rd Additional District Judge, Durg, whereby the prayer for decree for divorce was dismissed. The suit was filed by the husband/appellant/applicant on the ground that the respondent/wife has deserted him without any sufficient cause. The instant appeal is filed by the husband.

3. The facts, as would reveal that the marriage of the appellant and the respondent took place on 03.11.1995 at Bhilai according to the Hindu rituals, thereafter, the respondent/wife joined her matrimonial home and started living there. It was pleaded that father and mother of boy were working at Andhra Pradesh and they used to visit there home at Bhilai within a gap of more than three months. It was stated that after the marriage, the wife got an opportunity of job and was selected as an Assistant Professor in the education department and she had to join her posting somewhere else other than her place of matrimoinal home. It was stated that the husband suggested the wife not to join her place of posting away from Bhilai but she did not hear the advice and however supported by her family members and without the consent eventually she joined her job at other place. Before that during the period of cohabitation a girl child was born on 16.10.1996. It was further pleaded that on 20.12.1996 the mother of the appellant while was going to Delhi, the wife went along with her and from Jhansi she was accompanied by her brother and she went to Gwalior. It was stated that according to the understanding she was to join back her mother-in-law while she was coming back from Delhi, but she did not join and instead joined her job. It was pleaded therefore, the non-applicant/wife without any sufficient cause has left the husband and since was working against the wish of the husband at different place of her matrimonial home, thus has deserted the husband, therefore, the marriage be annulled by decree of divorce under Section 13 (1) (i-b) of the Hindu Marriage Act. The petition for divorce was preferred by the husband on 15.01.1999 before the Court of Additional District Judge, Durg.

4. The non-applicant/wife contended that before the marriage it was stated that her husband is in a good job but after the marriage she came to know that the husband was not working anywhere. It was further contended that at the time of marriage this understanding was arrived at in between the family members that the wife being educated, she would join some job whenever she gets the same, to which the mother of the appellant/husband agreed for the reason that her daughter was also working. It was stated that the husband was completely dependent on his mother and father, therefore, the wife had decided to join a job. The non-applicant/wife further contended that before the marriage she had appeared for the examination & selection of Assistant Professor through Public Service Commission and after the marriage with the consent of the husband she appeared in the interview and in the month of May-June the result was declared, wherein she was selected. It was further stated that after such fact came to the notice of the family members of the husband, they started misbehaving with her and in the month of June, 1996, the family members of the wife were called to Bhilai and were told that their daughter-in-law may either do the job or give divorce to the boy. It was further stated that the family members of the wife were also subjected to misbehave. It was further stated that on 19.12.1996 while the mother-in-law of the respondent/wife was going to Jhansi, she joined her and she went uptill Jhansi, thereafter, along with his brother she went to Gwalior. She further stated that while the mother-in-law was coming back she again wanted to come back but she refused to take her back to Bhilai. It is further stated that the husband was completely depending as a parasite on his mother a











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top