SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Chh) 124

GAUTAM CHOURDIYA
Oriental Insurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Mangotin Bai – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Raj Awasthi, Adv., Amit Sahu, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

GAUTAM CHOURDIYA, J.

1. Being aggrieved with the award dated 09.12.2011 passed in Claim Case No. 181 of 2011 by the Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Balod, District Durg (C.G.), the Appellant/Insurance Company has preferred this appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 challenging the liability fastened upon it.

2. Facts of the case, in brief, are that on 25.03.2009 deceased- Bisnath was sitting as labour (Hammal) in the offending vehicle Truck-Tipper bearing registration No. CG-07/ZC/3515 which was being driven by non-applicant No.1, owned by non- applicant No. 2 and insured with non-applicant No.3. The said offending vehicle was going from Dallirajhara to Doundilohara, non-applicant No.1 driving the said vehicle in a rash and negligent manner, turned it turtle on the way near Shikaritola main-road, as a result thereof, Bisnath sustained grievous injuries and later on, died.

3. The learned Tribunal, in the impugned award, has awarded a compensation of Rs.3,90,000/- in favour of the Claimants with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of filing of the application till realization and fastened the liability upon the non-applicant No. 3 along with non









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top