SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Chh) 176

RAJENDRA CHANDRA SINGH SAMANT
SURAJ SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Praveen Dhurandhar, Adv., I. Lakra, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant, J.

This appeal has been preferred against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 20-02-2015 passed by the Special Judge [under Narcotic Dugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short 'the NDPS Act)], Durg (C.G.), in NDPS Case No. 15/2014 convicting the appellant for the offence under Section 21(B) of the NDPS Act and sentencing him to undergo R.I. 08 years along with fine Rs.25,000/- with default stipulation.

2. The case of prosecution in brief is this that on 27.07.2014, Sub- Inspector- B.R. Bisan (PW-5) received one information that the appellant/accused is in possession of brown sugar and trying to sell it. One information panchnama was recorded in Station House Diary vide Ex.-P/18. The intimation regarding the same was sent to the City Superintendent of Police vide Ex.-P/4, regarding which entry was made in the Station House Diary vide Ex.-P/19. Two witnesses were summoned regarding which entry was made in the Station House Diary vide Ex.-P/20. As he had no time to obtain search warrant therefore, he proceeded to the spot along with team of raiding party, regarding which entry Ex.-P/24 was made in the Station House Di















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top