SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Chh) 185

RAJANI DUBEY
MADAN TIWARI – Appellant
Versus
YASHWANT KUMAR SAHU – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Malay Kumar Bhaduri, R.K. Pali, Adv., S.K. Mishra, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Rajani Dubey, J.

Being aggrieved by the judgment dated 22.01.2010, passed by the 12th Additional Sessions Judge (FTC) Durg in Cr.A. No. 80/2007 whereby the judgment dated 29.05.2007 passed in Cr. Case No. 780/2007 has been affirmed by convicting the applicant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act and sentencing him to undergo RI for two years and fine of Rs. 5,000/- with default stipulation.

2. Short facts of the case are that the respondent No.1 filed a complaint alleging that applicant, who is running an institution (Pleasant Health Welfare Foundation) at Dongargaon and has appointed the complainant and 21 other persons on agreement basis. It is further case that the complainant and other persons deposited some amount as per the agreement, with the institution. In the agreement it was mentioned that the amount so deposited would be refunded after completion of probation period of one year. It is the case of the complainant and other persons that after completion of probation period, they have not been regularized therefore, the complainant and others demanded for refund of the amount of Rs. 3,16,000/- from the applicant/institution. The applicant issued a che













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top