SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Chh) 232

SHARAD KUMAR GUPTA
Shivbhajan – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Bulbul Agrawal, Vinod Tekam.

JUDGMENT :

Sharad Kumar Gupta, J.

1. In this criminal appeal the challenge levied is to the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 02.07.2001 passed by the Special Judge, Surguja (Ambikapur), C.G. in Spl. Criminal Case No. 205/1996 whereby and whereunder he convicted and sentenced the appellant as under:-

Conviction u/s. Section Sentence Fine sentence

3/7 of the EC Act RI for 2 years Rs. 1000/- in default of payment of fine RI for 3 months

2. In brief the prosecution story is that one person namely Dwarika Prasad was the registered owner of a tempo bearing registration No. MP/27/B-1586. He had appointed appellant as driver for the tempo. On 17.08.1996 co-accused Prahlad approached Dwarika Prasad and told him that he has a drum of kerosine which to be delivered at Ashok Petrol Pump. Dwarika Prasad asked the appellant to go along with tempo. Co-accused Prahlad loaded 200 ltr kerosene on the tempo and asked the appellant to deliver it at Ashok Petrol Pump. On the secret information of PW-2 Sub Inspector B.S. Kerketta seized the tempo along with 200 litres kerosene from appellant at Ashok Petrol Pump. He had no licence for keeping kerosene. After completion of the investigation


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top