SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Chh) 315

SANJAY K.AGRAWAL
RAJKUMAR MISHRA – Appellant
Versus
GURJEET KAUR BAJWA – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Abhishek Sinha, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.

Petitioner is an advocate working as a Notary duly appointed under the provisions of the Notaries Act, 1952 (hereinafter called as 'Act of 1952') and Rules made thereunder, while discharging his duty of Notary under the provisions of Act of 1952 and Rules made thereunder, he authenticated an Anubandh/Agreement on 18th /19th December 2004 in presence of two witnesses viz. Sukhdev Singh and Rajkumar Gupta. Thereafter respondent/complainant herein filed a complaint under Sections 465, 467, 468, 471, and 474 read-with Section 120-B of the IPC against the accused therein including the petitioner herein alleging commission of above-mentioned offences, in which the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, by order dated 25- 01-2016 took cognizance of offences under Section 420 read-with Section 120-B of the IPC against the accused person including the petitioner.

2. The petitioner herein calls in question the said order taking cognizance of above-stated offences inter alia contending that such a cognizance of offence against him (Notary) is expressly barred by provisions contained in Section 13(1) of the Act of 1952, as such, cognizance taken by the learned J

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top