SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Chh) 395

RAM PRASANNA SHARMA
BODU @ BOTU @ CHANDRA KUMAR JAISAWAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Rakesh Pandey, Lav Sharma, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Ram Prasanna Sharma, J.

This appeal is preferred against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 26-10-2010 passed by the Sessions Judge, Korba, District Korba (CG) in Sessions Trial No. 66 of 2007 wherein the said Court has convicted the appellant for commission of offence under Sections 342, 376 (1) and 506 Part II of the IPC and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three month, RI for seven years and to pay fine of Rs.6,000/- and RI for one year with default stipulations.

2. In the present case, prosecutrix is PW/1. As per version of the prosecution, on the date of incident i.e., 11-6-2007 at about 3.30 p.m., at village Tilkeja, present appellant confined the prosecutrix, threatened her life and forcefully committed rape on her. The matter was reported and investigated. After completion of trial, the trial Court convicted and sentenced him as aforementioned.

3. The appeal is preferred on the following grounds:

(i) There is no eye-witness in the matter and the evidence of prosecutrix is false and unreliable.

(ii) The link of prosecution story is broken at many points which shows innocent of the appellant.

(iii) Version of prosecution witnesses is










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top