SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Chh) 444

SANJAY K.AGRAWAL
Daduram – Appellant
Versus
Bhuri Bai (Died & Deleted) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Somnath Verma, Adv., Anil Mourya, Adv., Vivek Bhakta, Adv., R.K. Jaiswal, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Sanjay K Agrawal, J.

The following two substantial questions of law were framed for determination at the time of admission of this appeal as under: -

"1. Whether the finding of both the Courts below in respect of making the Hindu Succession Act applicable upon the parties to the suit was proper or not?

2. Whether the daughters of deceased Mardan have inherited and perfected the right over the property of their father on account of the fact that he had died prior to 1955?"

(Parties hereinafter will be referred as per their status shown and ranking given in the suit before the trial Court.)

2. The following genealogical tree would demonstrate the relationship among the parties: -

Chuchrung (Dead)

 

Mardan (Dead)

Puniram

Jagmati (Dead)

Tilobai (Dead)

Naanhibai (D-7)

Daduram (D-1)

Padumlal (D-2)

Laxminarayan (D-3)

Anandram (P-1)

Baratlal (P-2)

Shyamlal (P-3)

Ghasiya (Dead)

Kanhaiya (D-









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top