PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, VIMLA SINGH KAPOOR
Mahadev Singh – Appellant
Versus
Bihari Lal Sanadaya – Respondent
Prashant Kumar Mishra, J.
This is defendant's first appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 challenging the legality and validity of the judgment and decree passed by the trial Court allowing respondent/plaintiff's suit for specific performance for sale of land together with superstructure admeasuring 1008 sq.ft. bearing Nazul Sheet No.28, Plot No.21/1, Khaparganj, Bilaspur.
2. The respondent/plaintiff (henceforth 'the plaintiff') preferred the suit on pleadings that the appellant/defendant (henceforth 'the defendant') executed notarised agreement dated 4-10-2008 for sale of the suit property and received the entire sale consideration of Rs. 6.00 lacs on the date of agreement itself. The defendant agreed to execute the sale deed within 3 months and also agreed to handover possession of two shops built over the suit property, but possession was not delivered. Subsequently, defendant avoided to execute the sale deed despite repeated request by the plaintiff, therefore, legal notice dated 13-5-2009 was served on the defendant, but still the sale deed was not executed. Hence, the suit.
3. The defendant denied to have executed the agreement or receiving Rs. 6
Her Highness Maharani Shantidevi P. Gaikwad v Savjibhai Haribhai Patel and Others
Moumita Poddar v Indian Oil Corporation Limited and Another
Omprakash v Laxminarayan and Others
Parakunnan Veetill Josephs Son Mathew v Nedumbara Kuruvila’s Son and Others
Satish Kumar v Karan Singh and Another
Silvey and Others v Arun Varghese and Another
Yashchandra (D) By Lrs. v State of Madhya Pradesh and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.