SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Chh) 620

AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI, PARTH PRATEEM SAHU
PUSHPA KHALKO – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH URBAN ADMINISTRATION AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Kishore Bhaduri, Adv., Sunnyj Agrawal, Adv., Pankaj Singh, Adv., Fouzia Mirza, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.

1. Petitioners are Officers of various Municipalities of State of Chhattisgarh. They are working in the respective places of posting as Chief Executive Officers, Class B/C. Their appointment and selection is made by the State on the recruitment and recommendation made by the State Public Service Commission. They have been compelled to file the present Writ Application because by virtue of Schedule-IV appended to Chhattisgarh State Municipal (Executive Engineering/Health Services Recruitment & Conditions of Services) Rules, 2017 (for short, 'Rules 2017'), they have given avenues of promotion to Revenue Officers of the Municipalities to be promoted to the post of Executive Officers of the Municipalities.

2. They want the provisions of the Schedule to be struck down to be ultra vires not only of the Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India, as also because it also violates the scheme of things under the 74th Constitutional amendment, especially Part IX-A of the Constitution of India.

3. Schedule-IV of Rules 2017 reads as under:

Sl. No.













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top