SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Chh) 636

PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, VIMLA SINGH KAPOOR
ANIL MISHRA – Appellant
Versus
RAMPAL BORKAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Prasoon Agrawal, Adv., Hemant Gupta, Adv., Shashank Thakur, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

Prashant Kumar Mishra, J.

Trial Court has dismissed the appellant/plaintiff's suit for specific performance of agreement dated 1-10-2008 for an area admeasuring 0.79 acre out of total area of 0.968 hectares (2.38 acres) bearing khasra No.1355/1 situated at village Tifra, PH No.23, Tahsil & District Bilaspur.

2. The property belonging to the ancestors of the defendants No.1 to 3 devolved on them upon death of their mother namely; Smt. Padmini Bai. Their names are recorded as joint owners in the revenue record, but, according to the plaintiff, the partition has already taken place amongst the defendants in which the defendant No.1 was allotted 1/3rd share admeasuring 0.79 acre. The defendant No.1 approached the plaintiff for sale of his share i.e. 0.79 acre at the rate of Rs.42,00,000/- per acre. The negotiation was finalised in the presence of witnesses Bharti & Rajesh and the defendant No.1 received two cheques to the tune of Rs.1,70,000/- & Rs.80,000/-, in total Rs.2,50,000/- as advance and executed the agreement on 1-10-2008. As the execution of sale deed might have taken some time, the defendant No.1 requested that for the purpose of payment of stamp duty he desires to m
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top