SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Chh) 720

SANJAY K.AGRAWAL
Jant Ram Satnami – Appellant
Versus
Daya Das Satnami – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :H.B. Agrawal, Senior Advocate and Meera Jaiswal, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.

1. The substantial question of law involved, formulated and to be answered in this plaintiff's second appeal is as under:-

"Whether the lower appellate Court was justified in reversing the finding recorded by the trial Court that the sale deed dated 11.02.1997 executed by Sukariya Bai was without consideration and void ab initio?"

(For the sake of convenience, parties would be referred as per their status and ranking shown in plaint before the trial Court.)

2. Plaintiff Jantram filed a suit for declaring three sale deeds Exs. P-4, P-5 & P-6 executed by his mother Sukariya Bai on 11-2-1997 in favour of Dayadas (defendant No. 1), Neelkanth (defendant No. 2) & Premchand (defendant No. 3) to be null and void mainly on the ground that on 11-2-1997, the date on which sale deeds were executed by his mother, his mother was aged and illiterate woman and the defendants, taking benefit of her old age and illiteracy, fraudulently without payment of consideration to her, got the aforesaid sale deeds executed in their favour in the Office of the Registrar, Raipur. Since no consideration amount has been passed to seller Sukariya Bai, to his mother, and the defendants h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top