RAM PRASANNA SHARMA
AMAR KUMAR AGRAWAL – Appellant
Versus
RAMESH SINGH – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Ram Prasanna Sharma, J. - This acquittal appeal is preferred against the judgment dated 10-7-2019 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bilaspur in complaint case No. 402 of 2016 filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short, "the Act, 1881") wherein the said court acquitted the respondent for the said charge.
2. As per the complaint, appellant is the proprietor of Prabha Sales wherein sale and purchase of railway equipment/machinery is done. Respondent/accused is the proprietor of M/s. Tirupati Construction and he obtained tender/contract from Railway division, Bilaspur. Earlier both parties entered into agreement regarding work of the contract of the railway obtained by the respondent. Appellant provided money to the respondent, therefore, cordial relationship was built up between the parties. When respondent obtained new contract from South Eastern Central Railway, Bilaspur, then he demanded loan from appellant and appellant gave him loan to the tune of Rs.13,69,410/-. The respondent returned the amount of Rs.3,69,410/- to the appellant by cash and bank account and for remaining loan amount he gave a cheque bearing No. 887961 dated 2
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.