SANJAY K.AGRAWAL
DEEPAK KUMAR CHAKRABORTI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Sanjay K Agrawal, J. - Petitioner herein is facing trial for offence punishable under Sections 376, 506, 509-B of the IPC and Sections 66(E) and 67(F) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 which is pending consideration before the Court of Additional Sessions Judge (FTC), Bilaspur wherein he filed an application on 27/07/2019 for providing copy of the seized CD (compact disk) and pen drive as well as copy of victim's statement under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. On the same day, learned trial Court passed the impugned order (Annexure A/1) and directed the Assistant Sub-Inspector of Police, Mahila Thana, Bilaspur to provide the copy of the said seized CD and pen drive to the petitioner/accused, but declined to grant victim's statement to him recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. Thereafter, on 26/08/2019, inability was expressed on behalf of the prosecution to provide the copy of the said CD and pen drive to the petitioner/accused on the ground that the said documents are confidential in nature against which the present petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the petitioner/accused.
2. Mr. Rajeev Kumar Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner woul
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.