PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, PARTH PRATEEM SAHU
SHIRIS KUMAR GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
KESHAV PRASAD SINHA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Parth Prateem Sahu, J. - Appellant/Plaintiff by way of this first appeal under Section 96 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908 has challenged the legality, validity and propriety of impugned judgment and decree dated 12/09/2014 passed by learned District Judge, Balod, District Balod, Chhattisgarh in Civil Suit No.7-A of 2013 whereby learned trial Court dismissed the suit for specific performance of contract.
2. Facts of the case relevant in nutshell are that respondents No.1 and 2/defendants are owners of lands situated at Village Baghmara, Patwari Halka No.34, Tahsil Gundardehi, District Balod bearing Khasra Nos.127, 128/1, 128/2 measuring 0.36, 0.06, 0.18, total area of land is 0.60 hectare, which is situated on Gundardehi-Rajnandgaon Road (hereinafter referred to as 'disputed property').
3. As per the case of appellant/plaintiff, on 08/08/2011 he entered into an agreement (Ex. P-1) with respondents No.1 and 2/defendants to purchase property in dispute for a total consideration of Rs.15,50,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Lacs Fifty Thousand Only). On the said date, as per agreement, Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) has been paid as advance and rest of the amount is to be paid till
Hemanta Mondal and Others Vs. Ganesh Chandra Naskar
I.S. Sikandar (Dead) by LRS. Vs. K. Subramani and Others
Kamal Kumar Vs. Premlata Joshi and Others
N.P. Thirugnanam (Dead) by LRS Vs. Dr. R. Jagan Mohan Rao and Others
P. R. Deb and Associates Vs. Sunanda Roy
Sona Bala Bora and Others Vs. Jyotirindra Bhatacharjee
Umabai and Another Vs. Nilkanth Dhondiba Chavan (Dead) by LRS. and Another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.