JUDGMENT

Parth Prateem Sahu, J. - Heard on I.A. No. 1 of 2019, which is an application for condonation of delay of 08 days in filing the writ appeal. For the reasons stated in the application, it is allowed and the delay in filing of appeal is condoned.

2. Also heard on admission.

3. The Appellant aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Single Judge declining to interfere with the order passed by the Board of Revenue, wherein the Board of Revenue has set aside the order passed by the Additional Collector, wherein the order of mutation passed by the Tahsildar was set aside.

4. Declining to interfere with the order of the Board of Revenue by the learned Single Judge in writ petition made the appellant to file this appeal.

5. Brief facts in nutshell are that the Appellant obtained loan from Respondent No.4- Bank and against it he mortgage the property subject matter of the appeal. The description of the property is land bearing Kh. No.157/11, Kh. No.153/6 measuring 0.070 and 0.142 hectare situated at Purani Basti Road, Manendragarh, District - Korea.

6. That when the Appellant failed to make re-payment of the loan amount, Respondent No.4-Bank initiated proceedings under Securitiza