ABHAY NAYAK vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH - STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION MARDUM

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2019 Supreme(Chh) 976

PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, GAUTAM CHOURDIYA
ABHAY NAYAK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH - STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION MARDUM – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Yug Mohit Choudhary, Advocate, Payoshi, Advocate, Kishore Narayan, Advocate, Fouzia Mirza, Advocate, K.K. Singh, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Prashant Kumar Mishra, J. - These three connected appeals under Section 21 (4) of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 (for short 'the NIA Act') would call in question three separate orders passed by the trial Court (NIA Court) rejecting the appellant's prayer for his release on bail under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C.

2. The details of the police station, crime number, offence, etc., in respect of the all three appeals, as mentioned in the cause title of respective memo of appeal, are as under :

CRA No.	Spl. ST No.	Cr.No.	Police Station	Offence u/S
1213/19	109/2018	7/2017	Mardum, Dist. Bastar	120-B of the Indian Penal Code;
				13(1)(b), 18, 38 and 39(2) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 ; and
				8(1)(3)(5) of the Chhattisgarh Special Public Security Act, 2005
1146/19	105/2018	7/2017	Darbha, Dist. Bastar	120-B of the Indian Penal Code;
				4 and 5 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908;
				13(1)(b), 18, 38 and 39(2) of the Unlawful Activities

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2019 Supreme(Chh) 976

PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, GAUTAM CHOURDIYAABHAY NAYAK – AppellantVersusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH - STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION MARDUM – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA, GAUTAM CHOURDIYA
ABHAY NAYAK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH - STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION MARDUM – Respondent