MOHD GUDDU vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH STATION IN-CHARGE OFFICER

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2019 Supreme(Chh) 1068

ARVIND SINGH CHANDEL
MOHD GUDDU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH STATION IN-CHARGE OFFICER – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Sunil Tripathi, Advocate, Arun Kumar Shukla, Advocate, Apoorva Tripathi, Advocate, Anand Verma, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Arvind Singh Chandel, J. - This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 10.7.2017 passed by the Special Judge under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (henceforth 'the Act'), Jashpur in Special Criminal Case No.10 of 2016, whereby the Appellants have been convicted and sentenced as under:

Appellants	Conviction	Sentence
Appellant No.1, Mohd. Guddu	Under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Act	Rigorous Imprisonment for 10 years and fine of Rs.1,00,000/- with default stipulation
	Under Section 417 of the Indian Penal Code	Rigorous Imprisonment for 1 year and fine of Rs.500/- with default stipulation
Appellant No.2, Anupam Baranwal and Appellant No.3, Pappi Baranwal	Under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Act	Rigorous Imprisonment for 10 years and fine of Rs.1,00,000/- with default stipulation

2. Facts of the case, in brief, are that on 17.6.2016, Sub-Inspector Dipesh Saini (PW11) received information that in a Tata Indigo Car bearing registration No.OD 15A 4847, illegal Ganja was being transported from

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2019 Supreme(Chh) 1068

ARVIND SINGH CHANDELMOHD GUDDU – AppellantVersusSTATE OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH STATION IN-CHARGE OFFICER – Respondent

ARVIND SINGH CHANDEL
MOHD GUDDU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH STATION IN-CHARGE OFFICER – Respondent