CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT
Arvind Singh Chandel, J.
MOHD GUDDU - APPELLANT
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH THROUGH STATION IN-CHARGE OFFICER - RESPONDENT
Criminal Appeal No. 1190 of 2017
Decided On : 24-10-2019
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Section 42 – Criminal Trial - Search and Seizure - 39 packets of Ganja - Appeal against conviction - He recorded the information in Mukhbir Suchana Panchnama (Ex.P1) and in compliance with the provision contained in Section 42 of Act, forwarded the information to the S.D.O. (Police), vide Ex.P2. He called witnesses and thereafter reached the spot along with the witnesses and supporting staff. After sometime, the said Tata Indigo Car reached the spot - Car was stopped. The car was found being driven by Appellant Mohd. Guddu. Appellants Anupam and Pappi were found sitting in rear seat of the car. He gave the Appellants notice under Section 50 of Act vide Ex.P6 to P8. He obtained their consent for search vide Ex.P47 to P49. Nothing was found in bodily search of the Appellants. In search of the car, 19 packets of Ganja, total weight 20 Kgs., was found from below the front seat of the car, which was recovered from Appellant Mohd. Guddu vide Ex.P14. During further search of the car, 39 packets of Ganja, total weight 40 Kgs., was found from the dikki of the car, which was recovered from Appellants –Held, From the entries made in the Malkhana register (Ex.P39), it is also clear that the said register bears the entry of deposit of only the Ganja which was seized from Appellant, but the acknowledgment issued by the Malkhana Moharrir shows that it was also issued for deposit of the Ganja which was seized from Appellants Anupam and Pappi. According to the statement of Investigating Officer (PW11), when the car in question was stopped, Appellant Mohd. Guddu was found sitting in the driver seat of the car and remaining Appellants Anupam and Pappi were found sitting in the rear seat of the car. But, Constable (PW8), who was present at the spot along with Investigating Officer Dipesh Saini (PW11), has deposed that in the front seats of the car Appellants Mohd. Guddu and Anupam were found sitting and Appellant Pappi was found sitting in the rear seat of the car. From the statement of Rini Prasad (PW8), it is also established that all the written work was done at the police station after return thereto from the spot - Considering entire evidence available on record, the whole prosecution story seems to be suspicious because there are material contradictions between the statement of Constable Rini Prasad (PW8) and Investigating Officer (PW11). Dates are also wrongly mentioned in some of the relevant documents - Appeal is allowed.
JUDGMENT
Arvind Singh Chandel, J. - This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 10.7.2017 passed by the Special Judge under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (henceforth 'the Act'), Jashpur in Special Criminal Case No.10 of 2016, whereby the Appellants have been convicted and sentenced as under:
| Appellants | Conviction | Sentence |
| Appellant No.1, Mohd. Guddu | Under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Act | Rigorous Imprisonment for 10 years and fine of Rs.1,00,000/- with default stipulation |
|
| Under Section 417 of the Indian Penal Code | Rigorous Imprisonment for 1 year and fine of Rs.500/- with default stipulation |
| Appellant No.2, Anupam Baranwal and Appellant No.3, Pappi Baranwal
| Under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Act | Rigorous Imprisonment for 10 years and fine of Rs.1,00,000/- with default stipulation |
2. Facts of the case, in brief, are that on 17.6.2016, Sub-Inspector Dipesh Saini (PW11) received information that in a Tata Indigo Car bearing registration No.OD 15A 4847, illegal Ganja was being transported from Orissa. He recorded the information in Mukhbir Suchana Panchnama (Ex.P1) and in compliance with the provision contained in Section 42 of the Act, forwarded the information to the S.D.O. (Police), Kunkuri vide Ex.P2. He called witnesses and thereafter reached the spot along with the witnesses and supporting staff. After sometime, the said Tata Indigo Car reached the spot. The car was stopped. The car was found being driven by Appellant Mohd. Guddu. Appellants Anupam and Pappi were found sitting in the rear seat of the car. He gave the Appellants notice under Section 50 of the Act vide Ex.P6 to P8. He obtained their consent for search vide Ex.P47 to P49. Nothing was found in bodily search of the Appellants. In search of the car, 19 packets of Ganja, total weight 20 Kgs., was found from below the front seat of the car, which was recovered from Appellant Mohd. Guddu vide Ex.P14. During further search of the car, 39 packets of Ganja, total weight 40 Kgs., was found from the dikki of the car, which was recovered from Appellants Anupam and Pappi vide Ex.P15. The Appellants did not have any document regarding legal ownership or possession of the recovered Ganja. Witness Gourishankar Shah (PW4) was called to weigh the recovered Ganja vide Ex.P35. On being weighed, total weight of the Ganja was found to be 60 Kgs. 1 sample packet of 500 Gms. was prepared from the Ganja recovered from Appellant Mohd. Guddu and 1 sample packet of 500 Gms. was prepared from the Ganja recovered from Appellants Anupam and Pappi. Both the sample packets and the remaining quantity of Ganja were sealed and a Specimen Seal Panchnama (Ex.P26) was prepared. During search of the car, two number plates were found out of which one plate was bearing registration No.UP 44 Z 4847. Papers relating to the car were also found. The number plates, the documents relating to the car, the car and 20 Kgs. of Ganja were seized from Appellant Mohd. Guddu vide Ex.P24. Remaining 40 Kgs. of Ganja was seized from Appellants Anupam and Pappi vide Ex.P25. Statements of witnesses were recorded on the spot and Dehati Nalishi was also recorded. After return to the police station, First Information Report (Ex.P55) was registered. The seized property was deposited in the Malkhana and acknowledgment thereof (Ex.P42) was obtained. Sample packets were sent to the Forensic Science Laboratory for chemical examination. FSL report is Ex.P61 which is positive. Information of the complete action taken was sent to the higher officer. It was also found during investigation that actual registration number of the seized car was UP 44 Z 4847, but a forged number plate bearing registration number OD 15 A 4847 was fixed in the car and the car was being driven by Appellant Mohd. Guddu. It was also found that owner of the car was Ha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.