SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Chh) 1086

MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA
JUGRI BAI AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
KAMLA BAI – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J. - This appeal is directed against judgment and decree dated 25.02.2003 passed by the Additional District Judge, Mungeli in Civil Appeal No.22-A/2000whereby the learned Lower Appellate Court modified the judgment and decree dated 11.08.2000 passed by Civil Judge, Class-I, Mungeli in Civil Suit No. 38-A/96.

2. This appeal was admitted on following substantial question of law -"Whether the first appellate Court committed an error of law by passing a decree and directing that the land purchased by the plaintiff be allotted to the share of Bhajiharin Bai after completing the partition from the revenue Court?"

3. Plaintiff-Kamla Bai filed a suit seeking declaration of title, partition and permanent injunction on the pleadings inter alia that vide registered sale deed dated 29.04.1995, she had purchased property in dispute described in Schedule-B from Dev Kunwar/defendant No.3 comprising of land admeasuring 0.85 acres situated in Khasra No. 490 of Village - Chandli, Tahsil - Lormi, District - Bilaspur. Plaintiffs case was that after having purchased share of Deo Kunwar, plaintiff became entitled to the share in the family property to the extent of sh

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top