SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Chh) 1117

GAUTAM CHOURDIYA
Durgadas, son of Gulab Chand Nag – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh (Now Chhattisgarh), Office of Lokayukt, Raipur (C. G. ) – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Shri Ram Kumar Tiwari, Advocate
For the Respondent:Shri Raghvendra Verma, Govt. Advocate

JUDGMENT :

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 28.08.1998 passed by the Second Additional Sessions Judge, Raipur in Special Criminal Case No. 13/88. By the impugned judgment, accused/appellant Durgadas has been convicted and sentenced in the following manner with a direction to run the sentences concurrently:

Conviction:

Sentence:

Under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947

Rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment of three months

Under Section 13(2)of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947

Rigorous imprisonment for two years and to pay fine of Rs.2,000/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment of three months

2. Brief facts of this case are that at the relevant point of time i.e. on 11.09.1986, the appellant/accused was posted as Junior Engineer in Electricity Board, Gariyaband. Complainant Maniram Verma (PW-4) applied for temporary electric connection for irrigation of his field vide re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top