IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
SANJAY K. AGRAWAL, J.
Shailu Tiwari @ Lala S/o Pawan Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
MCRC No. 1576 of 2021
Decided On : 21-05-2021
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 439 - Ganja was recovered - Possession - Charge-Sheet - Bail application - 5.400 kg of ganja was recovered from the possession of applicant No. 1, whereas 4.898 kg from applicant No. 2 and thereby they committed offence - Applicants would submit that applicants have not committed any offence and they have been falsely implicated in crime in question - He would further submit that ganja recovered from possession of the applicants is more than small quantity but less than commercial quantity, applicants are in jail since i.e. for more than 5 months.
Finding of the Court:
Nature and gravity of offence and further considering the quantity of ganja, which is more than a small quantity but less than commercial quantity, applicants are in jail since for more than 5 months, charge-sheet has already been filed and no custodial interrogation is required, Court inclined to release applicants on bail.
Result: Accordingly, bail application is allowed.
ORDER :
1. This is the first bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of regular bail to the applicants, who have been arrested in connection with Crime No. 606/2020, registered at Police Station - Khamtarai, District Raipur (CG), for the offence punishable under Section 20B of the NDPS Act, 1985.
2. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is that 5.400 kg of ganja was recovered from the possession of the applicant No. 1, whereas 4.898 kg from applicant No. 2 and thereby they committed the offence.
3. Learned counsel for the applicants would submit that the applicants have not committed any offence and they have been falsely implicated in the crime in question. He would further submit that the ganja recovered from the possession of the applicants is more than the small quantity but less than the commercial quantity, the applicants are in jail since 10.12.2020 i.e. for more than 5 months, the charge-sheet has already been filed and no custodial interrogation is required to be done, therefore, the applicants may kindly be released on bail.
4. On the other hand, learned State counsel would oppose the bail application.
5. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the case diary.
6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, nature and gravity of the offence and further considering the quantity of ganja, which is more than the small quantity but less than the commercial quantity, the applicants are in jail since 10.12.2020 i.e. for more than 5 months, charge-sheet has already been filed and no custodial interrogation is required, I am inclined to release the applicants on bail.
7. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. It is directed that the applicants shall be released on bail on each of them furnishing a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court for their appearance as and when directed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.