SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Chh) 51

SANJAY K.AGRAWAL
K. P. Patel S/o Late Shri Tejram Patel – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Neeraj Pradhan.
For the Respondent: Mr. Animesh Tiwari.

JUDGMENT :

SANJAY K. AGRAWAL, J.

1. Mr. Neeraj Pradhan, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that petitioner is working on the post of Assistant Grade III and he is entitled to be promoted on the post of Assistant Grade II in accordance with Chhattisgarh Panchayat Service (Recruitment and General Condition of Services) Rules, 1999, but while waiting for his case to be considered for promotion, respondent No. 6 has been transferred on the post of Assistant Grade II vide impugned order dated 16.07.2014 (Annexure P1) which is impermissible in view of Rule 27(ii) of the Rules of 1999, as such, the transfer of respondent No. 6 on the post of Assistant Grade II deserves to be quashed.

2. Mr. Animesh Tiwari, learned Deputy Advocate General appearing on behalf of respondent No. 1/State, would support the impugned order.

3. None appeared on behalf of respondent No. 6 though served.

4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties at length and perused the record.

5. True it is that respondent No. 6 has been transferred by the competent authority at Janpad Panchayat, Raigarh on the post of Assistant Grade II, but the said post of Assistant Grade II is a promotional post and as per rules

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top