SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Chh) 91

ARVIND SINGH CHANDEL
Bhaiyaram Satnami – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh through Police Station Jaijaipur, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Ms. Meenu Banerjee, Advocate
For the Respondent: Shri Akash Pandey, Panel Lawyer

JUDGMENT :

1. This appeal has been preferred against judgment dated 15.6.2016 passed by the First Additional Sessions Judge, Sakti, District Janjgir-Champa in Special Sessions Trial No.15 of 2015, whereby the Appellant has been convicted and sentenced as under:

Conviction

Sentence

Under Section 363 of the Indian Penal Code

Rigorous Imprisonment for 5 years and fine of Rs.5000 with default stipulation

Under Section 366A of the Indian Penal Code

Rigorous Imprisonment for 5 years and fine of Rs.5000 with default stipulation

Under Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (henceforth ‘the Pocso Act’)

Rigorous Imprisonment for 10 years and fine of Rs.10,000 with default stipulation

 

All the jail sentences are directed to run concurrently

2. According to the prosecution case, at the relevant time, age of the prosecutrix (PW3) was about 16 years and 4 months. According to the entries of Dakhil Kharij Register (Ex.P21C), her date of birth is 28.4.1999 and the date of inciden

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top