NARENDRA KUMAR VYAS
Chirag Combines Through : Proprietor/Director Himanshu Batawia – Appellant
Versus
Mahesh Chhabra @ Baggi – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Since common question of law & facts are involved in all the petitions under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C, therefore, they are heard together analogously and are being disposed of by this common order. [For deciding these CRMPs, facts of Cr.M.P. No. 727/2017 is being considered].
2. Petitioner – Chirag Combines has filed these petitions under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. against the order dated 21.03.2017 passed in Criminal Case Nos. 788/2013, 787/2013, 786/2013 & 789/2013, respectively whereby complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (henceforth “NI Act”) has been dismissed for want of prosecution and discharged the respondents/accused from the offence under Section 138 of the NI Act.
3. The brief facts as projected by the petitioner are that the petitioner is a distributor of Samsung Mobile phones. During course of business, the respondents have purchased mobile phone sets from the petitioner. The respondent has issued the following cheques in favour of the petitioner payable at Dena Bank, Branch Katora Talab, Shailendra Nagar, Raipur, towards sa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.