ORDER :

1. This criminal revision has been brought being aggrieved by the order of framing charge dated 15.02.2018, passed in S.T. No. 06 of 2018, by the learned Additional Sessions Judge (FTC), Kabirdham, District – Kabirdham under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the impugned order of framing charge is erroneous and perverse. There had been no evidence in the case to show that the applicant had abetted the deceased in any manner to commit suicide. Therefore, the charge framed against the applicant is not sustainable. Prayer is made to grant relief to the applicant.

3. Reliance has been placed on the judgment of this Court in Cr.R. No.225 of 2012, decided on 02.03.2020 between Jogender Singh & Another Vs. State of C.G. and in Raj Sekhar Paliwal & Anr. Vs. State of C.G. & Anr., reported in ILR 2020 Chhattisgarh 1420.

4. State counsel opposes the revision petition and the submission made in this respect. It is submitted that there is evidence in the record to show that the deceased committed suicide as a result of torture given by this applicant. Therefore, it is a clear case of abetment for commission of suicide. The