SANJAY K.AGRAWAL
Bharat Bajaj, S/o Bhawan Das – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of Home/Police, Mantralaya – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This petition under Section 482 of the CrPC is directed against the impugned order dated 18-2-2020 passed by the Special Judge, SCST (PA) Act, Bilaspur, directing DNA test of the petitioner/accused and the victim and one another at the request of the investigating officer, as Crime No.2/2019 for offence punishable under Section 376 of the IPC read with Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short, ‘the SCST Act’) has been registered against the petitioner.
2. The petitioner herein principally calls in question the order passed by the Special Judge on the ground that no opportunity of hearing was afforded to him while directing his DNA test and DNA test of the victim and one another, and the learned Special Judge did not apply her mind to the matter and without satisfying herself in respect of adequacy and sufficiency of material collected during investigation by the police against the petitioner, the impugned order has been passed, therefore the impugned order is liable to be set aside.
3. Mr. Vipin Punjabi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/accused, would submit that the learned Special Judge is
Bhupinder Sharma v. State of Himachal Pardesh
Dharam Deo Yadav v. State of U.P.
Kathi David Raju v. State of Andhra Pradesh and another
Krishan Kumar Malik v. State of Haryana
Mukesh and another v. State (NCT of Delhi) and others
Nipun Saxena and another v. Union of India and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.