RAJENDRA CHANDRA SINGH SAMANT
Ashish Bansal a. k. a. Golu, S/o. Govindram – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, Through Station House Officer, Police Station Sakti District-Janjgir, Champa (C. G. ) – Respondent
ORDER :
1. State counsel appearing for the respondent has raised a question regarding maintainability of the bail application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.
2. The offences have been registered against the applicants in all three cases under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (in short 'the Act, 2012') and also under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (in short 'the Act, 1989').
3. As regards the Act, 2012, the provision under Criminal Procedure Code are applicable, therefore, application under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. can be filed before High Court, however, different procedure has been provided under Section 14-A of the Act, 1989, which is as follows :-
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (3) of section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (2 of 1974), an appeal shall lie to the High Court agains
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.