SANJAY K.AGRAWAL
Dinesh Yadav – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Proceedings of this matter have been taken-up through video conferencing.
2. This is the first bail application filed on behalf of the applicant for grant of bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with Crime No. 212/2019, registered at Police Station Pithoura, District Mahasamund, for the offence punishable under Sections 363, 366, 376(2)(n) of the IPC and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short ‘the POCSO Act’).
3. When the matter is taken-up for final hearing, on being asked to learned counsel for the applicant as to whether notice to the victim/informant would be necessary before hearing the application for grant of bail in view of the amendment incorporated in the provision contained in Section 439(1A) of the Cr.P.C. Mr. Sunil Sahu, learned counsel for the applicant, would submit that though the applicant is charged with Section 6 of the POCSO Act, but under Section 439(1A) of the Cr.P.C. offences under the POCSO Act have not been included and even under the provisions of the POCSO Act, there is no such provision like Section 15A of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.