SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Chh) 43

RAJANI DUBEY
Sheetal Ram Sahu – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Pragalbha Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Anurag Verma, PL.

JUDGMENT :

Rajani Dubey, J.

1. This appeal arises out of the judgment and order dated 20.11.99 passed by the Eighth Additional Sessions Judge, Durg in Sessions Trial No. 62 of 1999 convicting the accused/appellant under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC and sentencing him to undergo RI for five years and fine of Rs. 500/- u/s. 420; to undergo RI for four years and fine of Rs. 500/- u/s. 467; to undergo RI for five years and fine of Rs. 500/- u/s. 468; to undergo RI for five years and fine of Rs. 500/- u/s. 471 with default stipulations.

2. As per prosecution case, complainant Dilip Kumar son of Jhumuk Lal lodged a report on 14.10.1998 at Police Station Arjunda alleging that the appellant has administered injection to his father as a result of which there was swelling in his hand and when he complained to the appellant, he administered another injection. It is further alleged that on account of which his father was admitted at district hospital Rajnandgaon, where he died. Merg intimation was given, thereafter panchnama was prepared and the body was sent for postmortem examination. After filing of the charge sheet, trial judge has framed charge under Sections 304, 420, 467, 468 and 471

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top