SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Chh) 36

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Parth Prateem Sahu, J.
Nitin Limbu – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
MCRC Nos. 5774 of 2021 and 6086 of 2021
Decided On : 18-01-2022

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :T.K. Tiwari, Maneesh Sharma and Shaleen Singh Baghel, Advocates.
For the Respondent:Dinesh Tiwari, Dy. Govt. Advocate, Ranbir Singh, Shashank Thakur and Priyankesh Chandrakar, Advocates.

The admissibility of evidence, including the Narco Analysis Test report, and the material collected during the investigation, is crucial in determining the involvement of the accused in a crime.

Headnote:

Bail - Criminal Law - Sections 302, 201, 120B, 193 of IPC and Sections 25, 27 of the Arms Act - The court discussed the admissibility of Narco Analysis Test report and the material collected during the investigation to determine the involvement of the applicants in the commission of the crime.

Fact of the Case:

The applicants filed bail applications under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail as they were in custody in connection with a crime involving offenses under Sections 302, 201, 120B, 193 of IPC and Sections 25, 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the applicants were involved in the murder of a person on 10.9.2018.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that based on the material collected during the investigation, including statements of witnesses and details of mobile phone conversations, there was prima facie evidence of the applicants' involvement in the crime. The court concluded that it was not a fit case for granting regular bail to the applicants.

Issues: The main issue was whether the applicants should be granted regular bail considering the evidence collected during the investigation, including the admissibility of the Narco Analysis Test report.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the material collected during the investigation, including statements of witnesses and details of mobile phone conversations, to determine the involvement of the applicants in the crime. The court also considered the admissibility of the Narco Analysis Test report in reaching its decision.

Final Decision: The bail applications were rejected by the court.

JUDGMENT :

Parth Prateem Sahu, J.

1. As above two bail applications arise out of same crime number, they were being heard together and are decided by this common order.

2. Applicants have filed above applications under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail to them as they are in custody since 1.4.2021 & 2.4.2021 in connection with Crime No. 327/2018 registered at Police Station Lalbagh, Rajnandgaon for commission of offences under Sections 302, 201, 120B, 193 of IPC and Sections 25, 27 of the Arms Act.

3. Case of prosecution in brief is that on 10.9.2018 at about 9:30 p.m. merg was reported in concerned police station by Constable of Police Station Lalbagh, District Rajnandgaon that during patrolling duty when he reached near Rewadih Intersection on Nagpur-Rajnandgaon Road at about 8:30 p.m., he saw that one person came out from his car standing on road side bearing registration number CG04-KT-7000 in bleeding condition and fell down on road. Police Constable took injured to District Hospital in government vehicle where doctor declared him brought dead. Based on merg intimation, FIR is registered on same day at about 9:40 p.m. against unknown persons. During course of investigation, applicants were arrested on 1.4.2021 & 2.4.2021 respectively and their memorandum statements were recorded.

4. Mr. T.K. Tiwari & Mr. Maneesh Sharma, learned counsel for respective applicants would submit that applicants have not committed any crime as alleged against them. Alleged murder of Shubham Namdev was committed on 10.9.2018, police surprisingly arrested applicants on 1.4.2021 & 2.4.2021 respectively without there being any material connecting them in commission of aforementioned crime. Police recorded memorandum statement of applicants on respective date of their arrest. Applicants were arrested on the basis of report of Narco Analysis Test of applicants stated to have been conducted on 5.12.2019. Narco Analysis Test report is not an admissible piece of evidence, hence on that basis only it cannot be said that there is material connecting applicants with commission of aforementioned crime. In support of contention that Narco Analysis Test report is not an admissible piece of evidence, they place reliance upon decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Selvi vs. State of Karnataka Reported in (2010) 7 SCC 263 .

They further submit that after receipt of report Narco Analysis test, police recorded statement of some witnesses in the month of January, 2021. These witnesses are planted witnesses and not eyewitness of incident because none of them came forward to make any statement during these three years. It is further submitted that deceased was man of lose character, he was having relationship with several girls, he and his father were also arrested on allegation against them of commission of offence under Section 376 of IPC. Hence, possibility that deceased might be having several enemies cannot be ruled out. Except Narco Test report, there is no other material to connect applicant with crime in question, hence, in view of decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Selvi (supra), applicants may be enlarged on regular bail.

5. Per contra, Mr. Dinesh Tiwari, learned Deputy Government Advocate for the State opposes submissions of learned counsel for respective applicants and submits that during course of investigation, police collected messages and details of mobile phones with whom deceased had conversation on the date of incident. Immediately after incident, statements of Virendra Kumar Namdev, relative of deceased, Ramendra Namdev, father of deceased, and others were recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C. Police based on material collected during course of investigation, interrogated applicants. Police gave notice to applicants and one another co-accused for undergoing Narco Analysis Test and after obtaining their consent, they were put to Narco Analysis Test. From the material collected during investigation, before putting them to Narco

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top