SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Chh) 8

SANJAY K.AGRAWAL
Vijay Nigam – Appellant
Versus
State Government of Chhattisgarh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: U.R. Koshley.
For the Respondent: Ravi Bhagat.

JUDGMENT :

SANJAY K. AGRAWAL, J.

1. Smt. Radhika Nigam, wife of Shri Rameshchandra Nigam, while working in the post of Medicine Maker with respondent No. 2, died in harness on 13.06.2014. Petitioner, being the brother of deceased Radhika Nigam, on the strength of Will dated 17.04.2014 executed by Radhika Nigam in his favour, is claiming compassionate appointment from respondent No. 2 by way of this writ petition.

2. Mr. U.R. Koshaley, learned counsel for the petitioner, would submit that respondent No. 2 is absolutely unjustified in not considering the case of the petitioner and not granting compassionate appointment to him being the brother of deceased Radhika Nigam in terms of Circular dated 14.06.2013 issued by the State Government. He would further submit that on the basis of the Will dated 17.04.2014 executed by Radhika Nigam in favour of the petitioner, he is entitled for grant of compassionate appointment.

3. On the other hand, Mr. Ravi Bhagat, learned State counsel, would submit that petitioner's claim for compassionate appointment is barred by Clause 5¼d½ of the Circular dated 14.06.2013 issued by the State Government as on account of death of a married Government servant, his

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top