IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Sanjay K. Agrawal, Rajani Dubey, JJ.
Dhansai S/o Saharam Patel – Appellant (In Jail)
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House officer, Police Station Seepat - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No.501 of 2014
Decided On : 04-05-2022
Criminal Procedure Code,1973 - Section 374(2) - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 20(b)(ii)(C) - Ganja - Possession - Appellant was found in possession of 96.600 kg of ganja unauthorizedly amounting to Rs.4 lacks for sale and thereby committed offence - It is further case of prosecution that (PW-11), Station House Officer, Police Station Seepat received secret information from informant that appellant herein has illegally kept ganja in hut situated at Seepat Awas Mohalla near canal - On receipt of such information, entered that secret information into at Serial No.125 and sent notices to call for independent witnesses for preparing of Police Station (Ex.P-30C) and on same day at 11.50 o'clock (PW-1) and (PW-9) were present and in their presence (Ex.P-24) was prepared and that was also entered into Rojnamacha Sanha of Police Station (Ex.P-31C) and thereafter inspector (PW2) was directed to give secret information to superior officer and said officer with two sets of Exs.P24 and P25 proceeded towards office of SubDivisional Officer (Police), and later on, delivered written information to reader of SDOP, and received acknowledgement of same - All these proceedings were also entered into of Police Station (Ex.P-32C) - Whether learned Special Judge was justified in holding that the accused was found in possession of 96.600 kg. of ganja from his house – Held, in light of principle of law laid down by Supreme Court in Mohan Lal (supra) and Ram Rattan (supra), it is quite vivid that though case of prosecution is that appellant was tenant of the hut in question and (owner/landlord) has been examined by prosecution as prosecution witness (PW-5), but he has clearly stated that he/his father has constructed hut on Government land after encroaching said land and further said that Dhansai/appellant herein has never paid any rent to him against hut in question and he has further failed to identify appellant herein and prosecution has failed to prove rent certificate (Ex.P-27) as said certificate was signed by (PW-5) at instance of police personnels on their pressure that too on blank paper - As such, appellant was tenant of hut in question by prosecution from where ganja was seized is not established by prosecution - Court are of considered opinion that there is nothing to indicate that quantity of ganja recovered from house/hut in question was in conscious possession of the appellant herein or house was in possession of appellant as a tenant - As such, prosecution has failed to establish that appellant was tenant of premises/hut from where ganja was recovered and further failed to prove that ganja recovered was in conscious possession of the appellant herein and accused/appellant is entitled for acquittal on principle of benefit of doubt - Criminal appeal is allowed.
JUDGMENT :
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.
1. This criminal appeal under Section 374(2) of the CrPC is directed against the impugned judgment dated 21.2.2014 passed by the Special Judge (N.D.P.S.) Bilaspur in Special Case No.32/2011 by which the appellant has been convicted under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter called as 'NDPS Act') and sentenced him undergo rigorous imprisonment for 15 years and fine of Rs.2,00,000/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for 2 years.
2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 3.8.2011 the appellant was found in possession of 96.600 kg of ganja unauthorizedly amounting to Rs.4 lacks for sale and thereby committed the offence. It is further case of the prosecution that on 3.8.2011 Rajendra Singh Parihar (PW-11), Station House Officer, Police Station Seepat received secret information from informant that the appellant herein has illegally kept ganja in hut situated at Seepat Awas Mohalla near canal. On receipt of such information, Rajendra Singh Parihar entered that secret information into Rojnamacha Sanha at Serial No.125 and sent notices to call for independent witnesses for preparing mukhbir suchna panchnama of the Police Station (Ex.P-30C) and on the same day at 11.50 o'clock Kirti Kumar (PW-1) and Shiv Kumar (PW-9) were present and in their presence mukhbir suchna panchanama (Ex.P-24) was prepared and that was also entered into Rojnamacha Sanha of Police Station (Ex.P-31C) and thereafter inspector Isidor Khalko (PW2) was directed to give secret information to the superior officer and the said officer with two sets of Exs.P24 and P25 proceeded towards the office of the SubDivisional Officer (Police), Bilaspur and later on, delivered the written information to the reader of SDOP, Bilaspur and received acknowledgement of the same. All these proceedings were also entered into Rojnamacha Sanha of the Police Station (Ex.P-32C). It is also the case of the prosecution that investigating officer Rajendra Singh Parihar (PW-11) proceeded towards spot along with staff members and witnesses, he informed the accused/appellant herein about his right to be searched by Gazetted Officer under Section 50 of the NDPS Act vide Ex.P5 and consent of the accused was also recorded and thereafter hut was searched and psychotropic substance (later identified as Ganja) was recovered from hut, which were kept in 5 bags and one electronic weighing scale was also found. Search panchnama was prepared vide Ex.P10 and recovery panchnama was also prepared vide Ex.P11. After physical verification, it was found that the recovered substance was ganja. Identification panchanama of the substance i.e. ganja was prepared vide Ex.P12. Following the provisions of law, ganja was weighed and weighed panchnama was prepared vide Ex.P16 and total 96.600 kg. of ganja was recovered. Prior to that, verification panchnama of scale and weight used for the purpose of weighing the recovered ganja was also prepared vide Ex.P-15. Samras panchnama (Ex.P-13) by taking 2-2 samples of 50-50 grams from each bag of the seized ganja was prepared separately. On the same date at the same place, recovered and seized ganja along with other seized articles have been sealed by using the seal bearing refection of 'Police Station Seepat' in English and sample seal panchnama was also drawn as Ex.P17. Seizure memo of seized article has been prepared vide Ex.P20 and thereafter accused Dhansai was arrested vide Ex.P-23. Thereafter statements of independent witnesses Kirti Kumar (PW-1) and Shiv Kumar (PW-29) were recorded as Exs.-P1 and P29 and FIR was registered against the appellant herein vide Ex.P36. Seized ganja and its sample were kept in malkhana of Police Station Seepat and entry has been made in this regard into japt mal register of Police Station Seepat vide Ex.P48. Action taken report was prepared vide Ex.P-38 and sent to the Superintendent of Police, Bilaspur. Samples
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.