NARENDRA KUMAR VYAS
Bilaspur Spinning Mills & Industries Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Union of India, through the Secretary, Ministry of Labour, New Delhi – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition (L) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging legality and validity of the order dated 14.06.2011 (Annexure P/1) passed by respondent No. 5 (Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal) affirming the order dated 29.11.2006 (Annexure P/2) passed by respondents No. 2 & 3 and also the order dated 17.08.2011 (Annexure P/3) passed by respondent No. 5 by which the review petition filed by the petitioner has been rejected.
2. The brief facts as reflected from the record are that on 26.10.1991, the Provident Fund Inspector, Madhya Pradesh has filed 80 criminal complaint (Annexure P/4) before the Judicial Magistrate First Class-cum-Labour Court, Bilaspur complaining for prosecution of petitioner company for commission of offences under Paragraph 76 (d) of the Employees' Provident Funds Scheme, 1952 read with Sections 14 (1), 14(1A), 14(2), 14A & 14AA of the Act, 1952 as they defaulted in making payment of provident fund dues for the period from July, 1986 to January, 1991, as such, liable to be punished under S
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.