GOUTAM BHADURI, DEEPAK KUMAR TIWARI
Kishor Kumar S/o Shri. Vishnu Singh Verma – Appellant
Versus
Maya Devi W/o Shri Kishor Kumar – Respondent
Case Details: Appeal under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 read with Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 against judgment dated 12.2.2016 in Civil Suit No.226-A/2014 by the 3rd Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Durg, decreeing respondent-wife's suit under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for restitution of conjugal rights. [10000098550001]
Marriage and Separation: Marriage solemnized on 5.5.2001 between appellant (Kishor Kumar) and respondent (Smt. Maya Devi) at Village Junwani, Tehsil Gunderdehi, District Durg; parties living separately. [10000098550001][10000098550002]
Respondent's Claim: Respondent filed suit on 19.6.2003 alleging appellant withdrew from society without reasonable excuse; after one month of marriage, respondent went to parental home to complete B.Sc., returned after exams on 6.5.2002; anonymous letters raised character doubts, leading appellant to refuse cohabitation. [10000098550001][10000098550002]
Appellant's Defense: Appellant admitted marriage but claimed respondent converted to Islam, became Shabnam Nisha, and married Saiyyad Zuber; learned of this post-6.5.2002 when bringing her home; suppressed facts by respondent and her father. [10000098550002]
Evidence Presented: Respondent examined AW-1 to AW-4; appellant examined NAW-1 to NAW-5 (including Saiyyad Zuber as NAW-2, handwriting expert NAW-3). Lower court allowed respondent's suit. [10000098550003]
Appellant's Evidence on Marriage: Marriage certificate (Ex.-D/1, Ex.-D/10) under Special Marriage Act, 1954 (Case No.157/01) between respondent (Maya Devi @ Shabnam Nisha) and Saiyyad Zuber on 20.12.2001, conclusive under Section 13; affidavits (Ex.-D/14, D/15), photos (Ex.-D/11), marksheets (Ex.-D/12, D/13); Khulanama Talaq (Ex.-D/18); anonymous letters (Ex.-D/3 to D/6). [10000098550005][10000098550011][10000098550015][10000098550016]
Respondent's Response: Denied conversion or marriage to Saiyyad Zuber; challenged certificate authenticity; anonymous letters sent by unknowns, even pre-marriage; Saiyyad Zuber was her tutor. [10000098550006]
Section 9 HMA Overview: Court may decree restitution if spouse withdrew without reasonable excuse; burden on withdrawer to prove reasonable excuse. [10000098550008][10000098550010]
Appellant's Testimony: Respondent stayed one month post-marriage, then studied for a year; brought her home 6.5.2002; verified letters, obtained marriage certificate; social meeting where respondent and father admitted marriage. [10000098550011][10000098550012]
Supporting Witnesses for Appellant: NAW-5 (Gulab Ram Deshmukh, society executive) and NAW-4 (appellant's father) confirmed social meeting admission of respondent's marriage post-conversion. [10000098550013]
Respondent's Cross-Examination: AW-1 denied marriage proceedings/photos (later called look-alike); AW-2 (father) admitted photo was daughter's, Saiyyad Zuber's involvement in counseling, his fleeing after 6 months, no action against him, no police progress on Section 498A complaint. [10000098550014]
Saiyyad Zuber's Testimony: Married respondent 20.11.2001 (Nikahnama Ex.-D/9), unaware of her prior marriage; registered marriage at her insistence (Ex.-D/10); cohabited 5 days; Khulanama Talaq 18.7.2002 (Ex.-D/18). [10000098550015]
Court's Analysis of Evidence: Anonymous letters verified leading to discovery of secret second marriage; social meeting, police inaction, proved connections; marriage certificate conclusive evidence. [10000098550016][10000098550017]
Legal Effect of Certificate: Under Section 13 Special Marriage Act, certificate conclusive proof of marriage formalities. [10000098550005][10000098550017]
Conversion and Second Marriage: Conversion does not dissolve Hindu marriage; provides ground for divorce under Section 13 HMA; second marriage void under Sections 11, 17 HMA and Section 43 Special Marriage Act, offence under IPC Sections 494/495. [10000098550019] (!) (!) (!)
Finding on Reasonable Excuse: Respondent's conduct (conversion, second marriage) sufficient reasonable excuse for appellant's withdrawal; appellant established defense. Lower court findings perverse. [10000098550020][10000098550021]
Final Decision: Appeal allowed; impugned judgment set aside; respondent's Section 9 suit dismissed; parties bear own costs. [10000098550022][10000098550023][10000098550024]
JUDGMENT :
Deepak Kumar Tiwari, J.
1. This Appeal has been preferred under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 read with Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 against the judgment dated 12.2.2016 passed by the 3rd Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Durg District Durg in Civil Suit No.226- A/2014, whereby the suit of the respondent filed under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for Restitution of Conjugal Rights has been decreed.
2. Indisputably, the marriage between the appellant and the respondent was solemnized on 5.5.2001 at Village Junwani, Tehsil Gunderdehi, District Durg and both the parties are living separately. The respondent herein had filed a civil suit for Restitution of Conjugal Rights under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, on 19.6.2003 stating that marriage between the appellant and the respondent was solemnized according to Hindu custom, and at the time of marriage, the appellant and the respondents were Hindu. The respondent has already passed B.Sc. 2nd Year Exam and on the insistence of the appellant, the respondent agreed to complete her graduation as a regular student, and for the said purpose, the appellant left the respondent
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.