Back
ARUP KUMAR GOSWAMI, RAKESH MOHAN PANDEY
Tularam @ Khamman Sai S/o Shri Dev Sai – Appellant
Versus
South Eastern Coalfields Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
RAKESH MOHAN PANDEY, J.
1. In the instant writ appeal, the appellant has challenged the order dated 12.12.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 22 of 2002, whereby the writ petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging therein legality and validity of the order of his dismissal from service dated 28.12.2001 (Annexure P/10), has been dismissed.
2. The brief facts of the present case are that the appellant was appointed as General Mazdoor/Casual Piece Rated Loader under the respondents on 10.05.1984 and in service records his name was entered as Tula Ram, S/o Dev Sai. He was promoted to the post of Clerk Grade III on 13.09.1985, and thereafter, as Clerk Grade II on 20.02.1987 (Annexure-P/1). On 09.10.1999, a notice was issued to the appellant to produce academic certificates and thereafter, on 13.12.2000, again he was directed to produce matriculation certificate. The appellant informed the management of South Eastern Coalfields Limited (for short, ‘SECL’) on 29.12.2000 that his matriculation certificate has been misplaced, and therefore, he may be allowed some time to obtain duplicate certificate.
3. The management inste
Mistakes in implementation of disciplinary proceedings do not invalidate findings against impersonation if the misconduct is substantiated. Delays in proceedings, while regrettable, do not excuse fra....
Disciplinary proceedings were upheld as valid; delay and procedural flaws were insufficient to overturn dismissal for misconduct.
The power of judicial review, of the Constitutional Courts, is an evaluation of the decision-making process and not the merits of the decision itself. It is to ensure fairness in treatment and not to....
The appointment being void ab initio precludes the petitioner from claiming reinstatement and other benefits.
The doctrine of proportionality cannot be invoked in cases where the employment is based on a forged document.
The judgment emphasizes the importance of specific and proven charges, adherence to procedural rules, and consideration of the petitioner's explanation in disciplinary proceedings.
No pay cannot be applied to the present facts of the case, since the petitioner did not attend to work on account of illegal order of suspension and dismissal from service, passed by the appellants h....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
