IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
RAKESH MOHAN PANDEY, J.
M/s J.K. Transport Shri Nemichand Nahar S/o Shri Chunni Lal Nahar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors. S/o Through Its Secretary Finance Department - Respondent
WPT No. 62 of 2012
Decided on : 11-12-2023
Challenged Order - Commercial Tax - Chhattisgarh Value Added Tax Act, 2005, Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Section 8(3)(b), Rule 13 of the Central Sales Tax (R & T) Act, 1957
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner challenged the order dismissing the revision and affirming the previous order, seeking to include various articles in the registration certificate under the Chhattisgarh Value Added Tax Act, 2005.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the authorities erred in rejecting the application to include the articles, as they are integral to the manufacturing process, and thus allowed the petitioner's application.
Issues: The issues revolved around the interpretation of Section 8(3)(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and Rule 13 of the Central Sales Tax (R & T) Act, 1957, and whether the articles were essential to the manufacturing process.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the interpretation of Section 8(3)(b) and Rule 13, emphasizing that articles used in the manufacturing process are eligible for concessional tax, even if not incorporated in the end-product.
Final Decision: The court set aside the Deputy Commissioner's order and allowed the petitioner's application to include the articles in the registration certificate, effective from the date of application.
JUDGMENT :
1. In the present petition, the petitioner has challenged the order passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Tax, Raipur dated 07.06.2012 whereby the revision preferred by the petitioner was dismissed and the order passed by the Commercial Tax Officer, Durg dated 19.04.2011 was affirmed.
2. Facts of the present case are that the petitioner is engaged in the execution of a works contract and a registration certificate was issued by the Commercial Tax Department under Chhattisgarh Value Added Tax Act, 2005 on 19.04.2011. The petitioner moved an application to include certain articles in the registration certificate according to provisions of Section 8(3)(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The articles which the petitioner mentioned in his application are Cement, Sand, Boulder, Murum, Gitti, Steel, Aggregates, Bitumen, Compressors, Plant & Machinery, Mining Machinery, Mixture Concrete, Pumping Set, Pay Loader, Lab Equipment, Moulds, Hot Mix Plant, Bitumen Tank, Fuel Tank, Roller Machine, Dumpers, Stone Crusher, Exploder, Generator, Drilling Machine, Weigh Bridge, Pavour (Mach & Hydraulic), Vibrator Roller, Crane, Loader, Grader Cum Excavators, Shunting Plates, Paint, Pipe and Fittings, Bitumen Sprayer, Oil & Lubricants, Tools, Mach Spares, Locomotives & Motor Vehicle tyre, Tubes of locomotives & Motor Vehicle, Cane Baskets & parts of accessories etc. on the ground that these articles and machinery are being used in processing goods for sale and construction of the road. The Commercial Tax Officer vide order dated 19.04.2011 partly allowed the application and added Soil (Murum) in the registration certificate but for the rest of the articles, the application was rejected. The petitioner preferred a revision before the Deputy Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Durg and vide order dated 07.06.2012, the same was rejected on the ground that Truck, Tripper, Dumper, JCB, Crane, Dozer etc. are not directly used in the execution of the works contract and the work can be done without using all these articles or goods. The petitioner has preferred this petition against the order passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Commercial Tax, Durg.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would invite the attention of this court to the provisions of Section 8(3)(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act, 1956’) and Rule 13 of the Central Sales Tax (R & T) Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act, 1957’). The provisions of Section 8 (1) of the Act, 1956 read thus:-
Provided that the Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, reduce the rate of tax under this sub-section.”
He would further submit that the goods referred to in sub-section 1 are goods of class or classes specified in the certificate of registration for use by the petitioner in the manufacture or processing or for sale or generation or distribution of electricity. He would further submit that goods include containers or other materials, packaging of goods or classes of goods etc. He would further argue that according to Rule 13 of Act, 1957, the goods may be materials, processing materials, equipment, tools, stores, spare parts, accessories, fuel or lubricants, which are being used in the manufacture or processing of goods for sale. He would also submit that Truck, Tripper, Dumper, JCB, Crane, Dozer and other articles mentioned in the application are being used in the execution of works contracts or for the construction of roads, therefore, these articles are an integral part of the manufacturing process and the Commercial Tax Officer a
Member, Board of Revenue, West Bengal v. Phelps and Co. (P.) Ltd. 1972 29 STC 101 (SC)
Chowgule & Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. Unior of India 1981 47 STC 124 (SC)
Articles used in the manufacturing process are eligible for concessional tax under Section 8(3)(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 and Rule 13 of the Central Sales Tax (R & T) Act, 1957.
Goods intended for use must be 'in mining' and not merely associated with mining operations.
The court held that the petitioner did not falsely represent the goods as covered by his Certificate of Registration, thus the penalty was not warranted.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the marketability of goods is essential to determine their liability for Central Excise duty. The goods must be capable of being sold in the o....
The definition of 'capital goods' under Rule 57Q includes items integral to production, allowing for MODVAT credit when such goods are essential for manufacturing processes.
Heavy earth-moving equipment qualifies as 'motor vehicles' under Section 2(28) of the Motor Vehicles Act, requiring registration and taxation irrespective of their use within enclosed premises.
Tender rejection upheld as petitioner failed to provide sufficient proof of machinery ownership as mandated, highlighting strict adherence to bid requirements.
Cold recyclers and soil stabilizers are classified as construction equipment, not motor vehicles, and thus do not require registration under the Motor Vehicles Act.
The form of certificate appended to a rule is an integral part of the rule and must be read in conjunction with it. Exemptions under tax laws must be strictly interpreted in favor of the revenue, and....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.