SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Del) 71

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
TATA SONS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
FASHION ID LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
JYOTSNA BAL KRISHNA, PRAVIN ANAND

Pradeep Nandrajog, J.

( 1 ) PLAINTIFFS pray:

" (A) An order restraining the defendant, its partners or proprietors as the case may be their officers, servants, agents and representatives and all others acting for and on their behalf from using the domain name "tatainfotecheducation. com or operating any business, making, selling/transferring, offering for sale, advertising and in any other manner dealing with goods or services using the plaintiffs trademarks TATA/tata INFOTECH/tata INFOTECH education or any other mark/name which is identical with or deceptively similar to the plaintiffs trademarks TATA/tata infotech, whether as a domain name or otherwise and from doing any other thing as is likely to do to passing off of the business and goods of the defendant as and for Thes of the plaintiffs;

(B) An order for freezing the website being operated under the domain name tatainfotecheducation. com and for the transfer of \the impugned domain name to the plaintiffs from the register of the registrar, NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC and for delivery-up of all impugned materials if any, including brochures, stationery and other printed matter, for purposes of destruction and/or erasure;

(C) An




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top